首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Plant Science >Leaf silica concentration in Serengeti grasses increases with watering but not clipping: insights from a common garden study and literature review
【2h】

Leaf silica concentration in Serengeti grasses increases with watering but not clipping: insights from a common garden study and literature review

机译:塞伦盖蒂草中的叶片二氧化硅浓度随浇水而增加但不随修剪而增加:一项常见的花园研究和文献综述的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Grasses (Poaceae) lack the complex biochemical pathways and structural defenses employed by other plant families; instead they deposit microscopic silica (SiO2) granules in their leaf blades (i.e., phytoliths) as a putative defense strategy. Silica accumulation in grasses has generally been considered an inducible defense; other research suggests silica accumulation occurs by passive diffusion and should therefore be closely coupled with whole plant transpiration. We tested the hypothesis that grasses increase leaf silica concentration in response to artificial defoliation in a common garden study in the Serengeti ecosystem of East Africa. Additionally, a watering treatment tested the alternative hypothesis that leaf silica was largely driven by plant water status. Leaf silica content of two dominant C4 Serengeti grass species, Themeda triandra and Digitaria macroblephara, was quantified after a 10-month clipping × water experiment in which defoliation occurred approximately every 2 months and supplementary water was added every 2 weeks. Themeda had greater silica content than Digitaria, and Themeda also varied in foliar silica content according to collection site. Clipping had no significant effect on leaf silica in either species and watering significantly increased silica content of the dominant tall grass species, Themeda, but not the lawn species, Digitaria. Our data, and those collected as part of a supplementary literature review, suggest that silicon induction responses are contingent upon a combination of plant identity (i.e., species, genotype, life history limitations) and environmental factors (i.e., precipitation, soil nutrients, grazing intensity). Specifically, we propose that an interaction between plant functional type and water balance plays an especially important role in determining silica uptake and accumulation.
机译:草(禾本科)缺乏其他植物科所采用的复杂的生化途径和结构防御;取而代之的是,它们将微细的二氧化硅(SiO2)颗粒沉积在其叶片(即植物石)中,作为一种可能的防御策略。人们普遍认为草中的二氧化硅积累是一种可诱导的防御;其他研究表明二氧化硅的积累是通过被动扩散发生的,因此应与整个植物的蒸腾作用紧密结合。在东非塞伦盖蒂生态系统的一项常见花园研究中,我们测试了一种假说,即草可增加叶片二氧化硅的浓度以响应人工脱叶。另外,浇水处理检验了另一种假设,即叶片二氧化硅很大程度上受植物水分状况的驱动。经过10个月的修剪×水实验,大约每2个月发生一次脱叶,并每2周添加一次补充水,然后对两种主要的C4塞伦盖蒂草种Themeda triandra和Digitaria macroblephara的叶片二氧化硅含量进行定量。根据收集地点的不同,Themeda的二氧化硅含量比洋地黄更高,并且Themeda的叶片二氧化硅含量也有所不同。修剪对两种物种的叶片二氧化硅均无显着影响,浇水显着增加了优势高草种Themeda的二氧化硅含量,但对草坪物种Digitaria却没有显着影响。我们的数据以及作为补充文献综述一部分收集的数据表明,硅诱导反应取决于植物的特性(即物种,基因型,生活史限制)和环境因素(如降水,土壤养分,放牧)强度)。具体而言,我们建议植物功能类型与水分平衡之间的相互作用在决定二氧化硅的吸收和积累中起着特别重要的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号