首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Strategy for communicating benefit-risk decisions: a comparison of regulatory agencies publicly available documents
【2h】

Strategy for communicating benefit-risk decisions: a comparison of regulatory agencies publicly available documents

机译:传达利益风险决定的策略:监管机构公开文件的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The assessment report formats of four major regulatory reference agencies, US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Health Canada, and Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration were compared to a benefit-risk (BR) documentation template developed by the Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science and a four-member Consortium on Benefit-Risk Assessment. A case study was also conducted using a US FDA Medical Review, the European Public Assessment Report and Australia's Public Assessment Report for the same product. Compared with the BR Template, existing regulatory report formats are inadequate regarding the listing of benefits and risks, the assigning of relative importance and values, visualization and the utilization of a detailed, systematic, standardized structure. The BR Template is based on the principles of BR assessment common to major regulatory agencies. Given that there are minimal differences among the existing regulatory report formats, it is timely to consider the feasibility of a universal template.
机译:比较了美国食品药品管理局,欧洲药品管理局,加拿大卫生部和澳大利亚的治疗药物管理局这四个主要监管参考机构的评估报告格式,与监管科学创新中心开发的收益风险(BR)文档模板进行了比较以及一个由四人组成的利益风险评估联盟。还使用美国FDA医疗评论,欧洲公共评估报告和澳大利亚针对同一产品的公共评估报告进行了案例研究。与BR模板相比,现有的监管报告格式在收益和风险列表,相对重要性和价值分配,可视化以及详细,系统,标准化结构的利用方面不够。无线电通信局模板基于主要监管机构通用的无线电通信局评估原则。鉴于现有监管报告格式之间的差异极小,因此现在应该考虑通用模板的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号