首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Framing Undergraduate Public Health Education as Liberal Education: Who Are We Training Our Students To Be and How Do We Do That?
【2h】

Framing Undergraduate Public Health Education as Liberal Education: Who Are We Training Our Students To Be and How Do We Do That?

机译:将大学公共卫生教育定为通识教育:我们要培训谁成为学生?我们该怎么做?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The rapid development of the undergraduate major in public health over the past 15 years has led to a debate about the most appropriate framing for the degree. Should it be viewed as a liberal education degree (akin to academic disciplines such as psychology and political science) or as a professional training degree (akin to disciplines such as nursing and management)? This paper presents an overview of both the liberal education and the professional training degree approaches to the undergraduate public health degree. The reality of public health work in the modern era and the constraints on undergraduate-level training lead to our conclusion that the liberal education framing is a more optimal way to design the degree program. Such a framework optimizes career opportunities, especially long-term opportunities, for graduates, acknowledges the reality of the complex and diverse career paths that one can take under the general umbrella of public health, and accounts for the important role of critical thinking skills in undergraduate education. Ultimately, the distinction between liberal education and professional training may be fuzzier than the debate often highlights—an intentional, well-designed, and thoughtfully implemented undergraduate public health curriculum can address the range of student needs underlying both the liberal education and professional training approaches to the degree, thus optimizing both learning goals and career outcomes for undergraduate public health students.
机译:在过去的15年中,公共卫生本科专业的快速发展引发了关于该学位最合适框架的争论。它应该被视为通识教育学位(类似于心理学和政治学等学科)还是专业培训学位(类似于护理和管理等学科)?本文概述了通识教育和大学公共卫生学位的专业培训学位方法。现代时代公共卫生工作的现实以及对本科水平培训的限制使我们得出这样的结论,即通识教育框架是设计学位课程的一种最佳方法。这一框架为毕业生优化了职业机会,特别是长期机会,承认了在公共卫生的总体框架下人们可以采取的复杂多样的职业道路的现实,并解释了批判性思维技能在本科生中的重要作用教育。归根结底,通识教育与专业培训之间的区别可能比辩论经常强调的要模糊:有意,精心设计,并经过深思熟虑的本科公共卫生课程可以解决通识教育和专业培训方法所基于的学生需求的范围。学位,从而优化公共卫生本科生的学习目标和职业成就。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号