首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Pediatrics >Principlism and Personalism. Comparing Two Ethical Models Applied Clinically in Neonates Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support
【2h】

Principlism and Personalism. Comparing Two Ethical Models Applied Clinically in Neonates Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

机译:本主义和个人主义。比较两种临床上应用于体外膜氧合支持的新生儿的伦理模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a technology used to temporarily assist critically ill patients with acute and reversible life-threatening cardiac and/or respiratory failure. This technology can often be lifesaving but is also associated with several complications that may contribute to reduced survival. Currently, neonates supported with ECMO are complex and bear an increased risk of mortality. This means that clinicians must be particularly prepared not only to deal with complex clinical scenarios, but also ethical issues associated with ECMO. In particular, clinicians should be trained to handle unsuccessful ECMO runs with attention to high quality end of life care. Within this manuscript we will compare and contrast the application of two ethical frameworks, used in the authors' institutions (Toronto and Rome). This is intended to enhance a broader understanding of cultural differences in applied ethics which is useful to the clinician in an increasingly multicultural and diverse patient mix.
机译:体外膜氧合(ECMO)是一项用于为患有急性和可逆性危及生命的心脏和/或呼吸衰竭的重症患者提供临时帮助的技术。该技术通常可以挽救生命,但同时也带来一些并发症,可能会降低生存率。当前,由ECMO支持的新生儿非常复杂,并且死亡风险增加。这意味着临床医生不仅必须特别准备应对复杂的临床情况,而且还要准备与ECMO相关的道德问题。特别是,应该对临床医生进行培训,以处理不成功的ECMO运行,同时要注意高质量的临终护理。在本手稿中,我们将比较和对比在作者机构(多伦多和罗马)中使用的两个道德框架的应用。这旨在增强对应用伦理学中文化差异的更广泛理解,这对于越来越多元文化和多样化患者组合中的临床医生很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号