首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Physiology >Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
【2h】

Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol

机译:暴露于冷热环境下不会影响间歇性短跑协议后足球裁判的决策能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow ~ −5°C, Madrid ~30°C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; −5°C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30°C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT; 18°C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.31; HIT p = 0.15; MISSED p = 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.
机译:足球裁判执行比赛规则,他们做出的决定会直接影响比赛结果。欧洲比赛中的固定装置通常在充满挑战的气候条件下进行(例如,莫斯科〜-5°C,马德里〜30°C)。这些温度对球员表现的影响有据可查。但是,对于这种环境压力如何损害足球裁判员的认知能力知之甚少,如果如此,运动是否会加剧这种情绪。本研究旨在调查感冒的影响[COLD; -5°C,40%相对湿度(RH)],炎热(HOT; 30°C,40%RH)和温带(CONT; 18°C,40%RH)条件在足球特定运动期间进行决策。在每种情况下,分别有13位男性参加体育锻炼;半职业裁判或半职业足球运动员完成了三个90分钟的间歇性跑步机方案,模拟了比赛情况,并穿插了4个计算机交付的认知测验,以测量警惕性和双重任务能力。在整个方案中记录核心和皮肤温度,心率,感知劳累等级(RPE)和热感觉(TS)。在双重任务(互动效应:FALSE p = 0.46;未解决p = 0.72;追踪p = 0.22)或警惕性评估(互动效应:FALSE p = 0.31; HIT p = 0.15)之间,决策条件之间没有显着差异。 ;遗漏的p = 0.17),尽管所测量的生理变量存在显着差异(皮肤温度:HOT vs.CONT 95%CI = 2.6至3.9,p <0.001; HOT vs.冷95%CI = 6.6至9.0,p <0.001; CONT相对于冷95%CI = 3.4至5.7,p <0.01)。假设在条件之间的决策能力上缺乏差异是由于使用了运动方案,因为它可能没有引起适当和有效的足球特定内部负荷来改变认知功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号