首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Systematic Review of Phytotherapeutic Treatments for Different Farm Animals Under European Conditions
【2h】

Systematic Review of Phytotherapeutic Treatments for Different Farm Animals Under European Conditions

机译:欧洲条件下对不同农场动物进行植物治疗的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is a growing global threat and has aroused a global interest in limiting antibiotic use in animal agriculture. As we are entering the post-antibiotic era, there is a growing need for identifying alternatives to antibiotics for prevention and treatment. Although phytotherapeutic remedies are available and are used in Europe, evidence of their efficacy is currently very limited but is nevertheless still necessary. A systematic review of phytotherapy used for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases in farm animals has been conducted using the PICOS approach. Analysis and extraction of information from studies was performed according to a protocol, and included: publication year and source, research body, species, farming system, purpose of application, disease in focus, diagnostic method, remedy used (origin and ingredients of the remedy), producer of remedy, way of administration, study design, and control groups, measure of effect, and outcome of the study. A total of 1,705 papers were screened, but only 44 (comprising 53 independent studies) met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the scientific studies identified show limitations in the study design as well as in presentation and standardization of the botanical remedies studied, which limits the possibilities of drawing firm conclusions. Preventive effect was investigated in 89% of the studies. Half of the studies reported uncertain effects of the botanical remedies on subclinical measures in comparison to a control group. The review highlights unresolved questions such as the need for standardized controlled trials and for improved standardization of the botanical products by analytical methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography. It is necessary to consider this in order to achieve replicable outcomes and establish efficacy and safety of phytotherapy in farm practice. The manageability of alternative medicine in farm animals also warrants further investigation so as to ascertain whether all necessary preconditions for their use are being granted.
机译:抗生素抗性的出现和扩散是日益严重的全球威胁,并引起了全球对限制动物农业中抗生素使用的兴趣。随着我们进入后抗生素时代,越来越需要确定预防和治疗抗生素的替代品。尽管在欧洲有可用的植物治疗药物,但其功效的证据目前非常有限,但仍然有必要。已经使用PICOS方法对用于治疗和预防家畜传染病的植物疗法进行了系统的综述。根据协议对研究信息进行分析和提取,包括:出版年份和来源,研究机构,物种,耕作制度,应用目的,重点疾病,诊断方法,使用的药物(药物的来源和成分) ),药物的生产者,给药方式,研究设计和对照组,效果的度量和研究结果。共筛选了1,705篇论文,但只有44篇(包括53项独立研究)符合纳入标准。所鉴定的大多数科学研究在研究设计以及所研究植物药的介绍和标准化方面均显示出局限性,这限制了得出明确结论的可能性。 89%的研究对预防效果进行了研究。一半的研究报告说,与对照组相比,植物疗法对亚临床措施的不确定作用。该评论着重指出了尚未解决的问题,例如需要进行标准化对照试验,以及通过分析方法(例如高效液相色谱法)改进植物产品的标准化。为了实现可复制的结果并在农场实践中确定植物疗法的有效性和安全性,必须考虑这一点。农场动物中替代药物的可管理性也值得进一步研究,以确定是否已批准使用它们的所有必要前提条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号