首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >In silico Comparison of Test-and-Cull Protocols for Bovine Tuberculosis Control in France
【2h】

In silico Comparison of Test-and-Cull Protocols for Bovine Tuberculosis Control in France

机译:在法国比较牛结核病控制试验和剔除方案的计算机模拟

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Whole depopulation of cattle herds (WHD) confirmed infected by bovine tuberculosis (bTB) has led since the 1950s to a drop of herd incidence in France below 0.1% in 2000, justifying the current officially bTB free (OTF) status of the country. However, this protocol is expensive, ethically questionable, and difficult for breeders to accept because the number of confirmed animals in an infected herd is often very low. A test-and-cull protocol combining at least three screening sessions of the entire herd followed by the slaughter of all the non-negative animals has been used for some years. The aim of this work was to evaluate in silico the epidemiological effectiveness, the public costs and the acceptability to farmers of this test-and-cull protocol as well as of several ones. A stochastic compartmental model of within-herd bTB spread was used. Six test-and-cull protocols were compared: two versions of the official protocol and four alternatives with varying delays between screenings, and varying tests used. Protocols were simulated for an average French beef herd, and compared to WHD. Three key indicators were computed: the failure probability of the protocol (a failure being defined as an herd recovering its OTF status recovery while still infected, indicator of epidemiological effectiveness), its overall public cost and the percentage of farmers who would have dropped it to switch to WHD (indicator of acceptability to farmers). Failure probability ranged from 1.4 to 12.4% and was null (by definition) for WHD. The median cost varied between 2.7 and 78 K€ for the test-and-cull protocols, vs. 120 K€ for WHD. The percentage of dropout ranged from 7.8 to 22%. The optimal tradeoff between epidemiological effectiveness, public costs, and acceptability to farmers was obtained for protocols with an increased delay (6 months instead of 2 in the currently used protocol) between the last two screening sessions, with either 3 or 2 screening sessions. This study may help improving the official test-and-cull protocol applied in France under European Union regulation, by suggesting alternative protocols, very effective, cheaper, and more acceptable than WHD.
机译:自1950年代以来,已确认被牛结核病(bTB)感染的牛群(WHD)的整体种群减少导致法国的牛群发病率在2000年下降到0.1%以下,这证明该国目前的官方无bTB(OTF)地位是合理的。但是,该方案昂贵,在伦理上存在问题,并且育种者难以接受,因为受感染牛群中已确认的动物数量通常非常少。几年来一直采用结合至少至少3次全猪场筛查和所有非阴性动物屠宰的试验和剔除方案。这项工作的目的是在计算机上评估这种“测试和剔除协议”以及一些协议的流行病学有效性,公共成本以及对农民的可接受性。牛群内bTB传播的随机间隔模型被使用。比较了六个测试和剔除方案:两个正式版本的协议和四个替代方案,筛选之间的延迟有所不同,所使用的测试也有所不同。对法国普通牛群的协议进行了模拟,并与WHD进行了比较。计算了三个关键指标:协议失败的可能性(失败的定义是在感染后恢复其OTF状态恢复的牛群,流行病学有效性的指标),总体公共成本以及将其降至切换到WHD(农民接受程度的指标)。 WHD的失败概率为1.4%至12.4%,并且为零(根据定义)为空。测试和剔除协议的中位数成本在2.7到78K欧元之间,而WHD则为12万欧元。辍学率在7.8%至22%之间。在最后两个筛查环节之间进行3或2次筛查环节之间的延迟时间增加(6个月,而不是目前使用的2个月),从而获得了流行病学有效性,公共成本和对农民的可接受性之间的最佳权衡。这项研究提出了替代性协议,该协议比WHD更为有效,便宜和可接受,可以帮助改进法国根据欧盟规定实施的官方“检验与剔除”协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号