首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Broiler Chickens On-Farm Welfare Assessment: Estimating the Robustness of the Transect Sampling Method
【2h】

Broiler Chickens On-Farm Welfare Assessment: Estimating the Robustness of the Transect Sampling Method

机译:肉鸡场福利评估:估算样条抽样方法的稳健性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Assessing commercial broiler chickens' welfare usually comes at the cost of reduced precision due to the large flock sizes and required time commitments. The transect method for on-farm welfare assessment is conducted by walking within delimited paths between feeder and drinker lines within the commercial house, referred to as transects. This non-invasive method is conducted by detecting birds with signs of impaired welfare indicators, which include leg problems, sickness, body wounds, and feather dirtiness. The transect method has been validated for commercial turkey flocks but not for broiler chickens due to the large flock sizes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness of the transect method in broiler chicken flocks through a capture–recapture approach of a known subpopulation of 80 birds. Groups of 10 chickens were captured and individually marked in eight locations of the house. Two observers collected the number and position of the detected marked birds while walking along non-adjacent transects (four samplings/house/day) during the two following days. Detection and repetition rates per house, and within transects, were calculated, as well as the effects of flock density, transect number/house (six vs. eight), and sampling time (morning vs. afternoon). The number of traveled transects was calculated for birds detected more than once, and the population random distribution was tested by comparing the number of observed and expected birds/transect. Results showed more than 64% of detection rate with a repetition rate/house sampling of 24% and per transect of 1.66%. Higher repetition rates in six-transect houses and during morning samplings were detected. The number of traveled transects was higher in eight-transect houses and from birds first detected at walls, indicating longer traveled distances in wider houses. In addition, bootstrapping techniques were used to calculate the optimal sampling effort. Our findings indicate that the lowest repetition rates and optimal sampling can be achieved by assessing two transects, being one wall and one central, separated by three transects in between. Such sampling procedure would provide robust results for welfare assessment of commercial broiler chicken flocks.
机译:评估商业肉鸡的福利通常是以降低精度为代价的,原因是鸡群规模大且需要时间。农场福利评估的样带方法是通过在商品房中供料线和饮水器线之间的分隔路径内行走(称为样带)来进行的。这种非侵入性方法是通过检测福利指标受损的鸟类来进行的,这些福利指标包括腿部问题,疾病,身体伤口和羽毛脏污。由于羊群较大,这种横断面方法已通过商业火鸡群的验证,但不适用于肉鸡。这项研究的目的是通过采用已知的80只禽类的捕获-捕获方法来评估断面法在肉鸡群中的鲁棒性。捕获了每组10只鸡,并分别在房子的八个位置进行了标记。在接下来的两天中,当两名观察员沿着不相邻的样带(每间房屋/天四次采样)行走时,收集了检测到的标记鸟类的数量和位置。计算每个房屋以及在样带内的检测和重复率,以及群密度,样带数量/房屋(六对八)和采样时间(早上与下午)的影响。计算多次检测到的鸟类的横断面数量,并通过比较观察到的和预期的鸟类/横断面数量来测试种群随机分布。结果显示检出率超过64%,重复/室内采样率为24%,每个样例为1.66%。在六样房屋和早晨采样期间,检出的重复率更高。在八样房屋中以及从首次在墙壁上检测到的鸟类中,经过样线的数量更高,这表明在更宽的房屋中走动的距离更长。另外,使用自举技术来计算最佳采样工作量。我们的研究结果表明,最低的重复率和最佳采样可以通过评估两个断面来实现,这两个断面是一堵墙和一个中心,中间是三个断面。这样的抽样程序将为商品肉鸡群的福利评估提供可靠的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号