首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>G3: GenesGenomesGenetics >GWAS by GBLUP: Single and Multimarker EMMAX and Bayes Factors with an Example in Detection of a Major Gene for Horse Gait
【2h】

GWAS by GBLUP: Single and Multimarker EMMAX and Bayes Factors with an Example in Detection of a Major Gene for Horse Gait

机译:GBLUP的GWAS:单标记和多标记EMMAX和贝叶斯因子以检测步态的主要基因为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bayesian models for genomic prediction and association mapping are being increasingly used in genetics analysis of quantitative traits. Given a point estimate of variance components, the popular methods SNP-BLUP and GBLUP result in joint estimates of the effect of all markers on the analyzed trait; single and multiple marker frequentist tests (EMMAX) can be constructed from these estimates. Indeed, BLUP methods can be seen simultaneously as Bayesian or frequentist methods. So far there is no formal method to produce Bayesian statistics from GBLUP. Here we show that the Bayes Factor, a commonly admitted statistical procedure, can be computed as the ratio of two normal densities: the first, of the estimate of the marker effect over its posterior standard deviation; the second of the null hypothesis (a value of 0 over the prior standard deviation). We extend the BF to pool evidence from several markers and of several traits. A real data set that we analyze, with ours and existing methods, analyzes 630 horses genotyped for 41711 polymorphic SNPs for the trait “outcome of the qualification test” (which addresses gait, or ambling, of horses) for which a known major gene exists. In the horse data, single marker EMMAX shows a significant effect at the right place at Bonferroni level. The BF points to the same location although with low numerical values. The strength of evidence combining information from several consecutive markers increases using the BF and decreases using EMMAX, which comes from a fundamental difference in the Bayesian and frequentist schools of hypothesis testing. We conclude that our BF method complements frequentist EMMAX analyses because it provides a better pooling of evidence across markers, although its use for primary detection is unclear due to the lack of defined rejection thresholds.
机译:用于基因组预测和关联映射的贝叶斯模型正越来越多地用于定量性状的遗传学分析中。给定方差成分的点估计值,流行的SNP-BLUP和GBLUP方法可共同估计所有标记对分析特征的影响。可以从这些估计值中构建单次和多次标记频率测试(EMMAX)。确实,BLUP方法可以同时被视为贝叶斯方法或常客方法。到目前为止,还没有从GBLUP生成贝叶斯统计信息的正式方法。在这里,我们证明了贝叶斯因子(一种公认的统计方法)可以计算为两个正态密度的比值:第一,标记效应在其后验标准偏差上的估计值;零假设的第二个(先前标准偏差的值为0)。我们将BF扩展为汇集来自多个标记和多个特征的证据。我们使用我们和现有的方法分析的真实数据集,分析了630个具有41711个多态性SNP基因型的马,以鉴定存在已知主要基因的特征“资格测试的结果”(解决马的步态或敏捷)。 。在马匹数据中,单个标记EMMAX在Bonferroni级别的正确位置显示出显着效果。尽管数值较低,但BF指向相同的位置。结合来自多个连续标记的信息的证据强度使用BF增加,使用EMMAX减少,这是由于贝叶斯和常识假设检验学派的根本差异所致。我们得出结论,我们的BF方法补充了频繁的EMMAX分析,因为它提供了跨标记的更好的证据集合,尽管由于缺乏定义的拒绝阈值,其在主要检测中的用途尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号