首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gastroenterology Research and Practice >Complimentary Imaging Modalities for Investigating Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Capsule Endoscopy Double-Balloon Enteroscopy and Computed Tomographic Enterography
【2h】

Complimentary Imaging Modalities for Investigating Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Capsule Endoscopy Double-Balloon Enteroscopy and Computed Tomographic Enterography

机译:调查暗淡胃肠道出血的免费成像方法:胶囊内窥镜检查双气囊小肠镜检查和计算机断层扫描小肠成像

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. The complimentary value of computed tomographic enterography (CTE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) combined with capsule endoscopy (CE) was evaluated in the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Methods. Patients who received CE examinations at Ruijin Hospital between July 2007 and July 2014 with the indication of OGIB were identified, and those who also underwent DBE and/or CTE were included. Their clinical information was retrieved, and results from each test were compared with findings from the other two examinations. Results. The overall diagnostic yield of CE was comparable with DBE (73.9% versus 60.9%) but was significantly higher than the yield of CTE (87% versus 25%, p < 0.001). The diagnostic yield of angiodysplasia at CE was significantly higher than CTE (73% versus 8%, p < 0.001) and DBE (39.1% versus 17.4%, p = 0.013), while no significant difference was found between the three approaches for small bowel tumors. DBE and CTE identified small bowel diseases undetected or undetermined by CE. Conversely, CE improved diagnosis in the cases with negative CTE and DBE, and findings at initial CE directed further diagnosis made by DBE. Conclusions. Combination of the three diagnostic platforms provides complementary value in the diagnosis of OGIB.
机译:目标。评价计算机断层扫描(CTE)和双气囊肠镜(DBE)结合胶囊内窥镜(CE)的互补价值,以诊断模糊的胃肠道出血(OGIB)。方法。确定了在2007年7月至2014年7月期间在瑞金医院接受过CE检查且有OGIB指征的患者,并包括了接受DBE和/或CTE治疗的患者。检索他们的临床信息,并将每次测试的结果与其他两次检查的结果进行比较。结果。 CE的整体诊断率与DBE相当(73.9%对60.9%),但显着高于CTE的诊断率(87%对25%,p <0.001)。 CE时血管增生的诊断率显着高于CTE(73%对8%,p <0.001)和DBE(39.1%对17.4%,p = 0.013),而三种小肠方法之间没有显着差异肿瘤。 DBE和CTE确定了CE未发现或不确定的小肠疾病。相反,CE可以改善CTE和DBE阴性的病例的诊断,而DBE最初对CE的发现指导进一步诊断。结论。三种诊断平台的组合在OGIB的诊断中具有互补的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号