首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Genetics >Measuring Selection Coefficients Below 10−3: Method Questions and Prospects
【2h】

Measuring Selection Coefficients Below 10−3: Method Questions and Prospects

机译:测量10−3以下的选择系数:方法问题和前景

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Measuring fitness with precision is a key issue in evolutionary biology, particularly in studying mutations of small effects. It is usually thought that sampling error and drift prevent precise measurement of very small fitness effects. We circumvented these limits by using a new combined approach to measuring and analyzing fitness. We estimated the mutational fitness effect (MFE) of three independent mini-Tn10 transposon insertion mutations by conducting competition experiments in large populations of Escherichia coli under controlled laboratory conditions. Using flow cytometry to assess genotype frequencies from very large samples alleviated the problem of sampling error, while the effect of drift was controlled by using large populations and massive replication of fitness measures. Furthermore, with a set of four competition experiments between ancestral and mutant genotypes, we were able to decompose fitness measures into four estimated parameters that account for fitness effects of our fluorescent marker (α), the mutation (β), epistasis between the mutation and the marker (γ), and departure from transitivity (τ). Our method allowed us to estimate mean selection coefficients to a precision of 2 × 10−4. We also found small, but significant, epistatic interactions between the allelic effects of mutations and markers and confirmed that fitness effects were transitive in most cases. Unexpectedly, we also detected variation in measures of s that were significantly bigger than expected due to drift alone, indicating the existence of cryptic variation, even in fully controlled experiments. Overall our results indicate that selection coefficients are best understood as being distributed, representing a limit on the precision with which selection can be measured, even under controlled laboratory conditions.
机译:精确测量适应性是进化生物学中的关键问题,尤其是在研究小效应突变时。通常认为,采样误差和漂移会阻止对非常小的适应性效应进行精确测量。我们通过使用一种新的组合方法来测量和分析适合度来规避这些限制。我们通过在受控实验室条件下在大批大肠杆菌中进行竞争实验,估计了三个独立的mini-Tn10转座子插入突变的突变适应性效应(MFE)。使用流式细胞仪评估非常大的样本的基因型频率可以减轻采样误差的问题,而漂移的影响则通过使用大量种群和大量重复采用适应性措施来控制。此外,通过进行祖先和突变基因型之间的四个竞争实验,我们能够将适应度测量分解为四个估计参数,这些参数说明了我们的荧光标记(α),突变(β),突变与标记(γ),并偏离传递性(τ)。我们的方法允许我们估计平均选择系数的精度为2×10 −4 。我们还发现突变和标记的等位基因效应之间的小但显着的上位性相互作用,并证实适应性效应在大多数情况下是传递性的。出乎意料的是,即使在完全受控的实验中,我们也检测到s量度的变化,该变化显着大于仅因漂移而导致的预期变化,表明存在隐秘变化。总的来说,我们的结果表明,最好将选择系数理解为是分布的,这代表了即使在受控的实验室条件下也可以测量选择的精度的极限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号