首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS German Medical Science >Is the aptitude of manual skills enough for assessing the training effect of students using a laparoscopy simulator?
【2h】

Is the aptitude of manual skills enough for assessing the training effect of students using a laparoscopy simulator?

机译:手动技能的能力是否足以评估使用腹腔镜模拟器的学生的培训效果?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The aim of this study was to determine if students are suitable candidates to assess the learning effect through a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator (LapSim®).>Materials and methods: 14 medical students in their final year without any previous experience with a virtual reality simulator were recruited as subjects. In order to establish a "base line" all subjects were instructed into the "clip application" task - a basis module of the laparoscopy simulator - at the beginning of the study. They were then randomized into two groups. Group A (n=7) had parameter adjusted to an easy level of performance, while group B (n=7) was adjusted to a difficult level. In both levels, errors simulated clinically relevant situations such as vessel rupture and subsequent bleeding. Each participant had to repeat the clip application task ten times consecutively.>Results: The mean time for completion ten repetitions was 15 min pro participant in group A and 20 min in group B. From the first to the fifth repetition group A improved significantly the task completion time from 238.9 s to 103.3 s (p<0.007) consecutively and also improved the error score from 312 to 177 (p<0.07). At the tenth repetition they increased the task completion time from 103.3 s to 152.2 s (p<0.09) and increased their error score from 177 to 202 (p=0.25).From the first to the fifth repetition group B also improved the task completion time from 131.6 s to 104.5 s (p<0.31) consecutively and improved the error score from 235 to 208 (p<0.32) but at the tenth repetition they increased the task completion time from 104.5 s to 142.4 s (p<0.45) and clearly increased their error score from 208 to 244 (p<0.38).>Conclusion: These results suggest that medical students, who lack clinical background, may be not suitable candidates for assessing the efficiency of a training model using a laparoscopy simulator. If medical students are appointed for such studies, they should receive didactic sessions in the context of a clinical curriculum prior to manual training.
机译:>背景:本研究的目的是确定学生是否适合通过虚拟腹腔镜模拟器(LapSim ®)评估学习效果。>材料和方法:招募了14名医学生,他们在最后一年没有任何虚拟现实模拟器的使用经验。为了建立“基线”,在研究开始时,所有受试者都被指示参加“夹子应用”任务-腹腔镜模拟器的基础模块。然后将它们随机分为两组。 A组(n = 7)的参数已调整为轻松的性能水平,而B组(n = 7)的参数已调整为较困难的水平。在两个级别上,错误均模拟临床相关情况,例如血管破裂和随后的出血。每个参与者必须连续重复剪辑应用程序任务十次。>结果:完成十次重复的平均时间是A组专业参与者15分钟,B组20分钟。从第一个到第五个重复组A的任务完成时间从238.9 s显着改善到103.3 s(p <0.007),并且错误评分从312改善到177(p <0.07)。在第10次重复时,他们将任务完成时间从103.3秒增加到152.2秒(p <0.09),并将错误评分从177分增加到202(p = 0.25)。从第1次到第5次重复B组也提高了任务完成率时间从131.6 s连续增加到104.5 s(p <0.31),错误评分从235改善到208(p <0.32),但是在第十次重复中,他们将任务完成时间从104.5 s增加到142.4 s(p <0.45)和明显将他们的错误评分从208提高到244(p <0.38)。>结论:这些结果表明,缺乏临床背景的医学生可能不适合使用以下方法评估训练模型的效率:腹腔镜模拟器。如果任命医学生进行此类研究,则应在进行手动培训之前,结合临床课程进行教学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号