首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Services Research >Breaking Narrative Ground: Innovative Methods for Rigorously Eliciting and Assessing Patient Narratives

【2h】

Breaking Narrative Ground: Innovative Methods for Rigorously Eliciting and Assessing Patient Narratives

机译：突破性的叙事：严格挑起和评估患者叙事的创新方法

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

ObjectiveTo design a methodology for rigorously eliciting narratives about patients' experiences with clinical care that is potentially useful for public reporting and quality improvement.

机译：目的旨在设计一种方法，以严格地得出有关患者在临床护理方面的经历的叙述，这可能对公开报告和质量改进很有帮助。

著录项

期刊名称 Health Services Research
作者
Rachel Grob; Mark Schlesinger; Andrew M. Parker; Dale Shaller; Lacey Rose Barre; Steven C. Martino; Melissa L. Finucane; Lise Rybowski; Jennifer L. Cerully;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2016(51),Suppl Suppl 2
年度 2016
页码 1248–1272
总页数 25
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类医院、综合医院;中医院;
关键词
Patient narratives patient experiences public reporting consumers qualitative methods patient‐centered care;

机译：患者叙事;患者经历;公共报告;消费者;定性方法;以患者为中心的护理;
入库时间 2022-08-17 12:08:36

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System 2.0: A multi-methodological approach to identifying and assessing narrative-emotion process markers in psychotherapy [J] . Angus Lynne E., Boritz Tali, Bryntwick Emily, Psychotherapy research: journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research . 2017,第3a4期

机译：叙事情绪过程编码系统2.0：一种多种方法论方法，可以在心理治疗中识别和评估叙事情绪过程标志物
2. Intervening in and Preventing Somali-American Radicalization with Counter Narratives: Testing the Breaking the ISIS Brand Counter Narrative Videos in American Somali Focus Group Settings [J] . Speckhard Anne, Shajkovci Ardian, Ahmed Mohamed Journal of Strategic Security . 2019,第4期

机译：使用反叙事来干预和防止索马里美国人激进主义：在美国索马里焦点小组设置中测试打破ISIS品牌反叙事视频的情况
3. Intervening in and Preventing Somali-American Radicalization with Counter Narratives: Testing the Breaking the ISIS Brand Counter Narrative Videos in American Somali Focus Group Settings [J] . Speckhard Anne, Shajkovci Ardian, Ahmed Mohamed Journal of Strategic Security . 2018,第4期

机译：使用反叙事来干预和防止索马里美国人激进主义：在美国索马里焦点小组设置中测试打破ISIS品牌反叙事视频的情况
4. Choosing to Help Monsters: A Mixed-Method Examination of Meaningful Choices in Narrative-Rich Games and Interactive Narratives [C] . Glena H. Iten, Sharon T. Steinemann, Klaus Opwis ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2018

机译：选择帮助怪物：在富裕的游戏和互动叙述中的有意义选择的混合方法检查
5. Using Peer- and Adult-Mediated Sociodramatic Play to Assess and Facilitate Preschoolers' Play, Play Discourse and Narrative: A Mixed Methods Study. [D] . Becker, Patricia Anne. 2015

机译：利用同伴和成人中介的社会戏剧来评估和促进学龄前儿童的戏剧，戏剧话语和叙事：一种混合方法研究。
6. Assessing emotions conveyed and elicited by patient narratives and their impact on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A psychophysiological investigation [O] . Teresa Gavaruzzi, Michela Sarlo, Francesca Giandomenico, 2012

机译：评估患者叙事所传达和引发的情绪及其对参与结肠直肠癌筛查的意图的影响：心理生理学调查
7. Breaking Narrative Ground: Innovative Methods for Rigorously Eliciting and Assessing Patient Narratives [O] . Rachel Grob, Mark Schlesinger, Andrew M. Parker, 2016

机译：打破叙事地面：严格诱因和评估患者叙事的创新方法

Breaking Narrative Ground: Innovative Methods for Rigorously Eliciting and Assessing Patient Narratives

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅