首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Promotion Perspectives >The effect of practical cooling strategies on physiological responseand cognitive function during simulated firefighting tasks
【2h】

The effect of practical cooling strategies on physiological responseand cognitive function during simulated firefighting tasks

机译:实际降温策略对生理反应的影响消防任务中的心理和认知功能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Firefighters often perform multiple tasks during firefighting operations under unknown and unpredictable conditions in hot and hostile environments. >Methods: In this interventional study each firefighters engaged in 4 conditions: namely (1) no cooling device; control (NC), (2) cooling gel (CG), (3) cool vest (CV), and (4) CG+CV. Cooling effects of the employed interventions were evaluated based on heart rate (HR), temporal temperature (TT), reaction time (RT), and the correct response (CR). >Results: HR and TT values for use of CG+CV (147.47 bpm [SD 4.8]; 37.88°C [SD 0.20]) and CV bpm (147.53 [SD 4.67]; 37.90°C [SD 0.22]) were significantly lower than the CG (153.67 bpm [SD 4.82]; 38.10°C [SD 0.22]) and NC (154.4 bpm [SD 4.91]; 38.11°C [SD 0.23]) at the end of the activity. RT and CR for use of CG + CV (389.87 ms [SD 6.12]; 143.53 [SD 1.24]) and CV (389.53 ms [SD 6.24]; 143.47 [SD 1.18]) were significantly higher than the CG (385.73 [SD 7.25] ms; 143.07 [SD 0.88]) and NC (385.67 ms [SD 7.19]; 143.00 [SD 0.84]) at the end of the activity. >Conclusion: It is concluded that CV was more effective than the CG in attenuating physiological responses and cognitive functions during firefighting operations. Furthermore, combining CV with CG provides no additional benefit.
机译:>背景:消防员经常在炎热和敌对的环境中在未知且不可预测的条件下进行灭火操作时执行多项任务。 >方法:在这项干预性研究中,每名消防员都处于4种情况:(1)没有冷却装置;对照(NC),(2)冷却凝胶(CG),(3)冷却背心(CV)和(4)CG + CV。根据心率(HR),时间温度(TT),反应时间(RT)和正确反应(CR)评估所采用干预措施的降温效果。 >结果:使用CG + CV(147.47 bpm [SD 4.8]; 37.88°C [SD 0.20])和CV bpm(147.53 [SD 4.67]; 37.90°C [SD]的HR和TT值活动结束时,CG(153.67 bpm [SD 4.82]; 38.10°C [SD 0.22])和NC(154.4 bpm [SD 4.91]; 38.11°C [SD 0.23])显着低于CG(153.67 bpm [SD 4.82]; 38.10°C [SD 0.22])。使用CG + CV(389.87 ms [SD 6.12]; 143.53 [SD 1.24])和CV(389.53 ms [SD 6.24]; 143.47 [SD 1.18])的RT和CR显着高于CG(385.73 [SD 7.25]活动结束时]] ms; 143.07 [SD 0.88])和NC(385.67 ms [SD 7.19]; 143.00 [SD 0.84])。 >结论:结论是,CV在减轻消防操作过程中的生理反应和认知功能方面比CG更有效。此外,将CV与CG结合使用不会带来任何额外好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号