首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heliyon >Comparative field performances between conventional combine and mid-size combine in wetland rice cultivation
【2h】

Comparative field performances between conventional combine and mid-size combine in wetland rice cultivation

机译:常规联合收割机与中型联合收割机在湿地水稻种植中的田间比较性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In paddy cultivation, harvesting is the most important operation, which needs suitable machinery. Thus, this study was carried out to compare field performances and energy and environmental effect between the conventional 5 m cutting width NEW HOLLAND CLAYSON 8080, 82 kW@2500 rpm combine harvester running on a total net area of 42.78 ha of plots for two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation seasons and the new mid-size 2.7 m cutting width WORLD STAR WS7.0, 76 kW@2600 rpm combine harvester running on a total net area of 16.95 ha of plots for two rice cultivation seasons. The conventional combine as compared to mid-size combine showed 14.4% greater mean fuel consumptions (21.13 versus 18.46 l/ha), 31.1% greater mean effective field capacity (0.69 versus 0.53 ha/h), 5.23% greater cornering time (turning time) percentage of total time (8.28% versus 3.05%) and 1.41% greater reversing time percentage of total time (7.2% versus 5.79%) but 20.90% lesser mean operational speed (3.24 versus 4.10 km/h), 11.69% lesser effective time percentage of total time (60.0%versus 71.69%h/ha), 10.8% lesser mean field efficiency (64.3% versus 72.1%). In terms of total energy use the conventional combine showed 24.64% greater mean total energy use in the harvesting operation (1445.81 versus 1160.00 MJ/ha), 14.46% greater mean fuel energy (1010.014 versus 882.39 MJ/ha), 56.47% greater mean machinery energy (431.32 versus 275.65 MJ/ha) and 59.25% greater mean human energy (3.48 and 2.18 MJ/ha), this cause 26.12% greater mean total Green House Gas emission (GHG) than the mid-size combine. The results revealed that the mid-size combine is more suitable in conducting the harvest operation in rice field in Malaysia than the conventional combine.
机译:在水稻种植中,收割是最重要的操作,需要合适的机械。因此,本研究旨在比较传统5 m切割宽度的NEW HOLLAND CLAYSON 8080、82 kW @ 2500 rpm联合收割机在两个水稻田的总净面积为42.78 ha上运行时的田间性能以及能源和环境影响。水稻种植季节和新的中型切割宽度2.7 m的WORLD STAR WS7.0、76 kW @ 2600 rpm联合收割机,在两个水稻种植季节的总土地面积上为16.95公顷。与中型联合收割机相比,传统联合收割机的平均燃油消耗量增加了14.4%(21.13对18.46 l / ha),平均有效田间容量增加了31.1%(0.69对0.53 ha / h),转弯时间(转向时间)延长了5.23% )占总时间的百分比(8.28%对3.05%)和倒车时间占总时间的百分比高1.41%(7.2%对5.79%),但平均操作速度却降低了20.90%(3.24对4.10 km / h),有效时间减少了11.69%占总时间的百分比(60.0%对71.69%h / ha),平均田间效率低10.8%(64.3%对72.1%)。就总能源使用量而言,常规联合收割机在收割作业中的平均总能源使用量增加了24.64%(1445.81比1160.00 MJ / ha),平均燃料能量增加了14.46%(1010.014与882.39 MJ / ha),平均机械量增加了56.47%能源(431.32对275.65 MJ / ha)和平均人均能量(3.48和2.18 MJ / ha)增加59.25%,这导致平均温室气体总排放量(GHG)比中型联合收割机大26.12%。结果表明,中型联合收割机比传统联合收割机更适合在马来西亚的稻田中进行收割作业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号