首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heliyon >Impact of climate-change risk-coping strategies on livestock productivity and household welfare: empirical evidence from Pakistan
【2h】

Impact of climate-change risk-coping strategies on livestock productivity and household welfare: empirical evidence from Pakistan

机译:气候变化风险应对策略对畜牧生产力和家庭福利的影响:来自巴基斯坦的经验证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using the primary datasets collected from 700 livestock farmers from all four major provinces of Pakistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit Baltistan, this paper analyzes the impact of climate-change risk coping strategies on household welfare. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate the determinants of the livestock ownership and multivariate probit model to assess the determinants of the measures taken to manage the climatic-risk challenge for livestock. A propensity score matching approach (PSM) was used to assess the impact of the adopted climate-risk management strategies on livestock farmers. Findings indicated that in Pakistan livestock farmers generally adopt four main types of strategies to cope with climate risk: livestock insurance, selling of livestock, allocation of more land area for fodder and migration. The results show that age, education, wealth, access to extension services, and membership in NGOs, influence the livestock farmers' choice of climate-risk-coping mechanisms. The livestock farmers who adopted risk-coping mechanisms generally fared better. Increasing the land area allocated to fodder seems to increase production of milk and butter, resulting in higher income and lower poverty levels. Those who bought insurance had more milk production and a lower poverty level, while those who sold livestock to cope with climate risk decreased production but increased household income and lowered poverty levels. Migration seems to have a negative impact on production and income. Impact assessments confirm that purchasing livestock insurance and increasing fodder areas are more effective compared to the selling of livestock and migration. Agricultural climate policy should focus on creating awareness as well as increasing access to extension services among livestock farmers on climate risk and risk-coping strategies to mitigate the impact on rural livelihoods.
机译:本文使用从巴基斯坦四个主要省以及Azad Jammu和Kashmir(AJK)和Gilgit Baltistan的700个畜牧业者收集的主要数据集,分析了气候变化风险应对策略对家庭福利的影响。 Poisson回归模型用于估计牲畜所有权的决定因素,多元概率模型用于评估管理牲畜气候风险挑战的措施的决定因素。倾向得分匹配法(PSM)用于评估采用的气候风险管理策略对畜牧业者的影响。研究结果表明,在巴基斯坦,牲畜养殖者通常采取四种主要策略来应对气候风险:牲畜保险,出售牲畜,为饲料和移民分配更多的土地面积。结果表明,年龄,教育程度,财富,获得推广服务的机会以及非政府组织的成员资格,都会影响畜牧业者对气候风险应对机制的选择。采取风险应对机制的畜牧业者普遍情况较好。增加分配给饲料的土地面积似乎增加了牛奶和黄油的产量,从而增加了收入并降低了贫困水平。购买保险的人有更多的牛奶产量和较低的贫困水平,而购买牲畜以应对气候风险的人减少了产量,但增加了家庭收入,降低了贫困水平。移民似乎对生产和收入产生负面影响。影响评估证实,与出售牲畜和移徙相比,购买牲畜保险和扩大草场面积更为有效。农业气候政策应侧重于提高认识,以及增加畜牧业者对气候风险和减轻风险对策以减轻对农村生计影响的推广服务的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号