首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy >A shared treatment decision‐making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes
【2h】

A shared treatment decision‐making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes

机译:慢性病患者与临床医生之间共享的治疗决策方法:糖尿病病例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper, we discuss the Charles et al. approach to shared treatment decision‐making (STDM) as applied to patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians. We perceive differences between the type of treatment decisions (e.g. end‐of‐life care, surgical treatment of cancer) that generated existing approaches of shared decision‐making for acute care conditions (including the Charles et al. model) and the treatment decisions that patients with chronic conditions need to make and revisit on an ongoing basis. For instance, treatment decisions in the chronic care setting are more likely to require a more active patient role in carrying out the decision and to offer a longer window of opportunity to make decisions and to revisit and reverse them without important loss than acute care decisions. The latter may require minimal patient participation to realize, are often urgent, and may be irreversible. Given these differences, we explore the applicability of the Charles et al. model of STDM in the chronic care context, especially chronic care that relies heavily on patient self‐management (e.g. diabetes). To apply the Charles et al. model in this clinical context, we suggest the need to emphasize the patient–clinician relationship as one of partners in making difficult treatment choices and to add a new component to the shared decision‐making approach: the need for an ongoing partnership between the clinical team (not just the clinician) and the patient. In the last section of the paper, we explore potential healthcare system barriers to STDM in chronic care delivery. Throughout the discussion we identify areas for further research.
机译:在本文中,我们讨论了Charles等。应用于慢性病患者及其临床医生的共享治疗决策(STDM)方法。我们认为治疗决策类型(例如临终护理,癌症的外科治疗)之间存在差异,这些决策产生了针对急性护理条件(包括Charles等人的模型)的共享决策的现有方法,以及患有慢性疾病的患者需要持续进行和重新检查。例如,与急性护理决策相比,慢性护理环境中的治疗决策更可能需要患者在执行决策中发挥更积极的作用,并为决策,重新访问和逆转决策提供更大的机会,而不会造成重大损失。后者可能需要最少的患者参与才能实现,通常很紧急,并且可能是不可逆的。鉴于这些差异,我们探讨了Charles等人的适用性。慢性护理背景下的STDM模型,尤其是严重依赖患者自我管理的慢性护理(例如糖尿病)。要应用Charles等。在这种临床背景下建立模型,我们建议需要强调患者与临床医生之间的关系,作为做出艰难治疗选择的合作伙伴之一,并为共享的决策方法添加新的组成部分:需要临床团队之间持续不断的合作伙伴关系(不仅是临床医生)和患者。在本文的最后一部分中,我们探讨了慢性病提供中STDM的潜在医疗保健系统障碍。在整个讨论中,我们确定了需要进一步研究的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号