首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heredity >Comparison of biometrical models for joint linkage association mapping
【2h】

Comparison of biometrical models for joint linkage association mapping

机译:联合链接关联映射的生物识别模型的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Joint linkage association mapping (JLAM) combines the advantages of linkage mapping and association mapping, and is a powerful tool to dissect the genetic architecture of complex traits. The main goal of this study was to use a cross-validation strategy, resample model averaging and empirical data analyses to compare seven different biometrical models for JLAM with regard to the correction for population structure and the quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection power. Three linear models and four linear mixed models with different approaches to control for population stratification were evaluated. Models A, B and C were linear models with either cofactors (Model-A), or cofactors and a population effect (Model-B), or a model in which the cofactors and the single-nucleotide polymorphism effect were modeled as nested within population (Model-C). The mixed models, D, E, F and G, included a random population effect (Model-D), or a random population effect with defined variance structure (Model-E), a kinship matrix defining the degree of relatedness among the genotypes (Model-F), or a kinship matrix and principal coordinates (Model-G). The tested models were conceptually different and were also found to differ in terms of power to detect QTL. Model-B with the cofactors and a population effect, effectively controlled population structure and possessed a high predictive power. The varying allele substitution effects in different populations suggest as a promising strategy for JLAM to use Model-B for the detection of QTL and then to estimate their effects by applying Model-C.
机译:联合连锁关联映射(JLAM)结合了连锁映射和关联映射的优点,是剖析复杂性状遗传结构的强大工具。这项研究的主要目标是使用交叉验证策略,重采样模型平均和经验数据分析来比较JLAM的七个不同生物特征模型,以校正人口结构和定量特征位点(QTL)检测能力。评价了三个线性模型和四个线性混合模型,这些模型采用不同的方法来控制人口分层。模型A,B和C是具有辅因子(Model-A)或辅因子和种群效应(Model-B)的线性模型,或者其中辅因子和单核苷酸多态性效应被建模为嵌套在种群内的模型(C型)。混合模型D,E,F和G包括随机种群效应(Model-D)或具有定义方差结构的随机种群效应(Model-E),亲缘关系矩阵定义了基因型之间的相关程度( F型)或亲属矩阵和主坐标(G型)。测试的模型在概念上是不同的,并且在检测QTL的能力方面也有所不同。具有辅助因子和种群效应的模型B,有效地控制了种群结构,具有很高的预测能力。对于不同的人群,不同的等位基因替代效应表明,JLAM可以使用模型B检测QTL,然后通过应用模型C估计其效应,这是一种很有前途的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号