首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association >Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel ligation: a systematic review
【2h】

Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel ligation: a systematic review

机译:保留脾脏并没有脾结扎的远端胰腺切除术:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>BackgroundSplenic preservation during a distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) may be performed with splenic vessel ligation, known as Warshaw's Technique (WT) or splenic vessel preservation (SVP). The consensus on which approach is best is divided. A systematic review of evidence in the literature was undertaken with the aim of analysing the merits and disadvantages of both WT and SVP.>MethodsA systematic search of medical literature from 1985–2011 was undertaken to identify all comparative studies and case series on SPDP. Non-English papers, series with < 5 patients, technical reports and reviews were excluded. The remaining articles were reviewed considering the study design, surgical technique, outcomes and complications.>ResultsIn 23 relevant studies, 356 patients underwent WT and 572 underwent SVP. In WT patients, the mean operating time (160 versus 215 min, P < 0.001), mean estimated blood loss (301 versus 390 ml, P < 0.001) and length of stay (8 versus 11 days, P < 0.001) was significantly less than the SVP patients, respectively. Considering complications, splenic infarction and splenectomy occurred more frequently in WT patients (P < 0.05).>DiscussionWT is technically easier to perform than SVP but has a higher incidence of subsequent splenectomies. Surgeons should be able to perform both procedures and tailor the technique according to the patient.
机译:>背景在远端胰腺切除术(SPDP)期间的脾脏保留可以通过脾脏血管结扎来进行,这被称为Warshaw技术(WT)或脾脏血管保留(SVP)。关于哪种方法最好的共识有所分歧。对文献中的证据进行了系统的综述,旨在分析WT和SVP的优缺点。>方法对1985-2011年间医学文献进行系统的检索,以鉴定所有比较研究以及SPDP上的案例系列。排除了少于5名患者的非英语论文,技术报告和评论。其余文章根据研究设计,手术技术,结局和并发症进行了回顾。>结果在23项相关研究中,有356例患者行WT,572例行SVP。在WT患者中,平均手术时间(160 vs 215 min,P <0.001),平均估计失血量(301 vs 390 ml,P <0.001)和住院时间(8 vs 11天,P <0.001)显着减少分别高于SVP患者。考虑到并发症,WT患者的脾梗死和脾切除术发生率更高(P <0.05)。>讨论 WT在技术上比SVP更容易实施,但随后的脾切除术的发生率更高。外科医生应能够执行两种手术并根据患者情况调整技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号