首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>HPB : The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association >Which is more cost-effective under the MELD system: primary liver transplantation or salvage transplantation after hepatic resection or after loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria?
【2h】

Which is more cost-effective under the MELD system: primary liver transplantation or salvage transplantation after hepatic resection or after loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria?

机译:在MELD系统下哪种方法更具成本效益:在米兰范围内进行原发性肝移植或肝切除术后或局部区域治疗后肝癌的挽救性移植?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectiveThe optimal strategy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a disease with increasing incidence, in patients with Child–Pugh class A cirrhosis has long been debated. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection (HR) or locoregional therapy (LRT) followed by salvage orthotopic liver transplantation (SOLT) vs. that of primary orthotopic liver transplantation (POLT) for HCC within the Milan Criteria.
机译:目的长期以来,关于Child-Pugh A级肝硬化患者治疗肝癌(HCC)的一种最佳方法是增加发病率。这项研究评估了米兰标准中肝切除(HR)或局部区域疗法(LRT)继而进行原位肝移植(POLT)抢救原位肝移植(POLT)与HCC的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号