首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >The Penetration Ability of Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealers into Dentinal Tubules Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study
【2h】

The Penetration Ability of Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealers into Dentinal Tubules Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study

机译:与传统的基于树脂的密封剂相比硅酸钙根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透能力:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the penetration ability of calcium silicate root canal sealers and conventional resin-based sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). A total of 60 recently extracted single-rooted human premolars were used in this study. The root canals were prepared to a size 40/0.06 taper with ProFile rotary instruments and irrigated with NaOCl and EDTA. After drying all canals, the specimens were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 20): Group 1, gutta-percha (GP)/AH Plus with continuous wave compaction; group 2, GP/BioRoot RCS with a single-cone technique; and group 3, GP/Endoseal MTA with a single-cone technique. All experimental samples were sectioned perpendicular to their long axis using a low-speed diamond wheel at the apical, middle, and coronal third levels. The penetration abilities of all samples were evaluated using CLSM. A Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a series of Mann–Whitney U post hoc tests were performed. A higher intensity level was found in the coronal area and a lower intensity level in the apical area in all the experimental groups. The AH Plus group showed higher sum fluorescence intensity in the apical and coronal thirds compared with the BioRoot RCS and Endoseal MTA groups, whereas the BioRoot RCS group showed a higher intensity level in the middle third, similar to the AH Plus group. The maximum sealer penetration depth was low in the apical area and high in the coronal area in the AH Plus and Endoseal MTA groups. In the BioRoot RCS group, maximum sealer penetration was observed in the middle third. In conclusion, there were significant differences in sealer penetration pattern and distance according to the root level and sealer type.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)比较硅酸钙根管封闭剂和常规树脂基封闭剂的渗透能力。这项研究总共使用了60个最近提取的单根人类前磨牙。用ProFile旋转器械将根管准备成40 / 0.06锥形,并用NaOCl和EDTA冲洗。将所有运河干燥后,将标本随机分为三个实验组(n = 20):第1组,连续波压紧的古塔胶(GP)/ AH Plus;第1组,连续胶凝。第2组,采用单锥技术的GP / BioRoot RCS;第3组,采用单锥技术的GP / Endoseal MTA。使用低速金刚石砂轮在心尖,中间和冠状三级垂直切开所有实验样品的长轴。使用CLSM评估所有样品的渗透能力。进行了Kruskal-Wallis分析和一系列Mann-Whitney U事后测试。在所有实验组中,冠状区域的强度较高,而顶端区域的强度较低。与BioRoot RCS和Endoseal MTA组相比,AH Plus组在顶端和冠状三分之二处显示更高的总荧光强度,而BioRoot RCS组在中间三分之一处显示出更高的强度水平,与AH Plus组相似。在AH Plus和Endoseal MTA组中,最大的封闭剂穿透深度在根尖区域较低,在冠状区域较高。在BioRoot RCS组中,在中间三分之一处观察到最大的密封剂渗透率。总之,根据根水平和密封剂类型,密封剂的渗透方式和距离存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号