首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Stress Intensity Factor of Semielliptical Surface Crack in Internally Pressurized Hollow Cylinder—A Comparison between BS 7910 and API 579/ASME FFS-1 Solutions
【2h】

Stress Intensity Factor of Semielliptical Surface Crack in Internally Pressurized Hollow Cylinder—A Comparison between BS 7910 and API 579/ASME FFS-1 Solutions

机译:内压空心圆柱体中半椭圆形表面裂纹的应力强度因子— BS 7910与API 579 / ASME FFS-1解决方案的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this research is to compare both British standard BS 7910 (2013) and American standard API 579/ASME FFS-1 (2016) stress intensity factor (SIF) solutions by considering a series of semielliptical surface cracks located in the external surface of a pressurized hollow cylinder in the axial direction. Finite element analysis was used as a comparison basis for both standards’ SIF results. The solution from the British standard provided consistent results compared to Finite Element (FE) results for crack depth not much higher than half the thickness in the deepest and surface-breaking points. Above those limits, the British standard’s solutions diverged quite a lot from the American standard, whose results followed FE values for every crack depth/thickness ratio tested with a maximum percentage difference of 1.83%.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较英国标准BS 7910(2013)和美国标准API 579 / ASME FFS-1(2016)应力强度因子(SIF)解决方案,方法是考虑位于轴承外表面的一系列半椭圆形表面裂纹轴向的加压空心圆柱体。有限元分析被用作两个标准的SIF结果的比较基础。与有限元(FE)结果相比,英国标准的解决方案提供了一致的结果,即裂纹深度不超过最深和表面断裂点厚度的一半。超过这些限制,英国标准的解决方案与美国标准相差很大,美国标准的结果遵循每个测试的裂纹深度/厚度比的FE值,最大百分比差为1.83%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号