首页> 外文会议>PVP2008;ASME pressure vessels and piping conference >COMPARISON BETWEEN API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 AND ASME VIII DIVISION 3 STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR SOLUTIONS USED FOR FRACTURE MECHANICS AND FATIGUE OF THICK WALLED CYLINDERS
【24h】

COMPARISON BETWEEN API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 AND ASME VIII DIVISION 3 STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR SOLUTIONS USED FOR FRACTURE MECHANICS AND FATIGUE OF THICK WALLED CYLINDERS

机译:API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1和ASME VIII部门3的应力强度因子解决方案用于厚壁圆筒断裂力学和疲劳的比较

获取原文

摘要

The paper discusses the differences between API 579-1/ASME FFS-1-1/ASME FFS-1 [1] and ASME Section VIII Division 3 [2] stress intensity factor solutions. In addition to this, the use of the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) in leak before burst analysis is compared to the present Division 3 approach. The paper contains the background of both approaches and a worked example demonstrating the effect of both methods. Finally, a simplified fatigue crack growth based life time study is presented.
机译:本文讨论了API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1-1 / ASME FFS-1 [1]和ASME Section VIII Division 3 [2]应力强度因子解决方案之间的区别。除此之外,将突发分析之前在泄漏中使用故障评估图(FAD)与当前的Division 3方法进行了比较。本文包含了这两种方法的背景以及一个演示了这两种方法的效果的实例。最后,提出了一种基于疲劳裂纹扩展的简化寿命研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号