首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Mediators of Inflammation >A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
【2h】

A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation

机译:成年中重度哮喘患者丙酸氟替卡松与布地奈德粉剂盲法比较:临床评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler®, and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler®, in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily.
机译:体内和体外数据表明,通常用于治疗哮喘的吸入糖皮质激素之间存在可检测的差异。然而,关于这些差异是否转化为临床益处仍存在争议。这项为期12周的国际,随机,双盲,平行组研究旨在比较每日服用800μg丙酸氟替卡松(FP)并通过Diskhaler ®以粉末形式给药的疗效和安全性,成年中度至重度哮喘患者,使用Turbuhaler ®给予布地奈德(BUD)每日1600μg。共有518位患者参加了该研究,其中256位接受了FP和262位BUD。评估12周治疗期间的平均早晨峰值呼气流量(PEF)显示,每天使用FP 800μg和使用BUD 1600μg的FP之间,疗效有统计学差异(p = 0.003),总体改善20.9 FP时为l / min,而BUD时为12.4 l / min。在12周内,平均夜间PEF(p = 0.04),昼间PEF变化(p = 0.03)和预测PEF百分比(p = 0.003)以及强制呼气量(p = 0.008),强制肺活量(p = 0.02)和PEF(p = 0.005)。在两个治疗组的12周研究期内,无症状夜的中位数百分比均有所增加,症状评分小于2的日中位数百分比也有类似变化,抢救药物使用和哮喘发作加重。发现两个治疗组的不良事件发生率相当。 FP的血清皮质醇水平的几何平均比率为1.03,表明从基线无平均下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴抑制,BUD为0.93(与FP相比,p = 0.0002)。总之,与每天BUD 1600μg相比,每天FP 800μg对中重度哮喘的疗效/安全性比更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号