首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Implementation Science : IS >Modeling technology innovation: How science engineering and industry methods can combine to generate beneficial socioeconomic impacts
【2h】

Modeling technology innovation: How science engineering and industry methods can combine to generate beneficial socioeconomic impacts

机译:技术创新建模:科学工程和行业方法如何结合起来产生有益的社会经济影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundGovernment-sponsored science, technology, and innovation (STI) programs support the socioeconomic aspects of public policies, in addition to expanding the knowledge base. For example, beneficial healthcare services and devices are expected to result from investments in research and development (R&D) programs, which assume a causal link to commercial innovation. Such programs are increasingly held accountable for evidence of impact—that is, innovative goods and services resulting from R&D activity. However, the absence of comprehensive models and metrics skews evidence gathering toward bibliometrics about research outputs (published discoveries), with less focus on transfer metrics about development outputs (patented prototypes) and almost none on econometrics related to production outputs (commercial innovations). This disparity is particularly problematic for the expressed intent of such programs, as most measurable socioeconomic benefits result from the last category of outputs.
机译:背景政府资助的科学,技术和创新(STI)计划除了扩展知识库之外,还支持公共政策的社会经济方面。例如,预计有益的医疗保健服务和设备将来自对研发(R&D)计划的投资,这些投资假定与商业创新具有因果关系。此类计划越来越被要求对影响的证据负责,即研发活动产生的创新产品和服务。但是,由于缺乏全面的模型和指标,导致证据收集偏向于关于研究产出(已发表的发现)的文献计量学,而很少关注与发展产出有关的转移指标(专利的原型),而几乎没有关注与生产产出有关的计量经济学(商业创新)。这种差距对于此类方案的明确意图尤其成问题,因为最可衡量的社会经济效益来自最后一类产出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号