首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Industrial Health >Shift schedules work factors and mental health among onshore and offshoreworkers in the Norwegian petroleum industry
【2h】

Shift schedules work factors and mental health among onshore and offshoreworkers in the Norwegian petroleum industry

机译:陆上和海上的班次安排工作因素和心理健康挪威石油工业的工人

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the present study was to answer the following research questions: (1) Do workers in different shift schedules differ in mental distress? (2) Do workers in different shift schedules differ in neuroticism? (3) Do shift schedules differ in psychosocial work exposures? (4) Do psychosocial work exposures contribute to mental distress among onshore- and offshore workers? (5) Does neuroticism confound the association between work exposures and mental distress? Workers on six shift-schedules answered a questionnaire (1,471 of 2,628 employees). Psychological and social work factors were measured by QPSNordic, mental distress was measured by HADS and neuroticism was measured by EPQ. The results showed 1) No differences in mental distress between workers in different shift schedules, 2) Revolving-shift workers reported higher neuroticism compared to day workers, 3) Swing-shift workers and revolving-shift workers reported lower job control compared to permanent-night and -day workers, 4) Job demands and role conflict were associated with more mental distress. Job control, role clarity, support, and leadership were associated with lower mental distress, 5) Neuroticism influenced the relationship between psychosocial work factors and mental distress. The present study did not find differences in mental distress between shift schedules. Job characteristics may be contributing factors when determining health effects of shiftwork.
机译:本研究的目的是回答以下研究问题:(1)不同轮班安排的工人的精神困扰是否不同? (2)不同轮班时间表的工人在神经质方面是否有所不同? (3)轮班时间表在社会心理工作方面有所不同吗? (4)心理社会工作暴露是否会导致陆上和海上工人的精神困扰? (5)神经质是否混淆了工作暴露与精神困扰之间的联系?六个轮班时间表的工人回答了一个问卷(2,628名员工中的1,471名)。通过QPSNordic评估心理和社会工作因素,通过HADS评估精神困扰,通过EPQ评估神经质。结果显示:1)在不同轮班时间表中,工人之间的精神困扰没有差异; 2)与轮班工人相比,轮班工人的神经质要强,3)轮班工人和轮班工人的工作控制力低于永久工人。 4)工作需求和角色冲突与更多的精神困扰有关。工作控制,角色清晰,支持和领导与较低的精神困扰有关,5)神经质影响了社会心理工作因素与精神困扰之间的关系。本研究未发现班次时间表之间的精神困扰有差异。在确定轮班对健康的影响时,工作特征可能是影响因素工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号