首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Conditioning by Means of Customized Healing Abutment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
【2h】

Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Conditioning by Means of Customized Healing Abutment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

机译:通过定制的愈合基台进行围植入物软组织调节:随机对照临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: An optimal aesthetic implant restoration is a combination of a visually pleasing prosthesis and adequate surrounding peri-implant soft tissue architecture. This study describes a novel workflow for one-step formation of the supra-implant emergence profile. Materials and Methods: Two randomized groups were selected. Ten control group participants received standard healing screws at the surgical stage. Ten individualized healing abutments were Computer aided Design/Computer aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-fabricated out of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) restoration material in a fully digital workflow and seated at the surgical stage in the test group. The modified healing abutment shape was extracted from a virtual library. The standard triangulation language (STL) files of a premolar and a molar were obtained considering the coronal anatomy up to the cement-enamel junction (CEJ). After a healing period ranging from 1 to 3 months depending on the location of the surgical site, namely, mandible or maxilla, a digital impression was taken. The functional implant prosthodontics score (FIPS) and the numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain were recorded and compared. Results: The mean FIPS value for the test group was 9.1 ± 0.9 while the control group mean value was 7.1 ± 0.9. In the test group, pain assessment at crown placement presented a mean value of 0.5 ± 0.7. On the contrary, the control group showed a mean value of 5.5 ± 1.6. Conclusions: Patients in the test group showed higher FIPS values and lower NRS scores during the early phases compared to the control group.
机译:简介:理想的美学种植体修复是视觉上令人愉悦的假体与适当的周围种植体周围软组织结构的结合。这项研究描述了一种新的工作流程,用于一步形成超植入物的出现轮廓。材料和方法:选择两个随机分组。十名对照组参与者在手术阶段接受了标准的愈合螺钉。十个个性化的愈合基台采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD / CAM)方法,以完全数字化的工作流程由聚醚醚酮(PEEK)修复材料制成,并位于测试组的手术阶段。从虚拟库中提取修改后的愈合基台形状。考虑到牙冠解剖直至水泥-牙釉质交界处(CEJ),获得了前磨牙和磨牙的标准三角测量语言(STL)文件。在根据手术部位(下颌骨或上颌骨)的位置从1个月到3个月不等的愈合期后,进行数字化印模。记录并比较功能性假牙修复评分(FIPS)和疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)。结果:测试组的平均FIPS值为9.1±0.9,而对照组的平均值为7.1±0.9。在测试组中,牙冠位置的疼痛评估的平均值为0.5±0.7。相反,对照组的平均值为5.5±1.6。结论:与对照组相比,试验组患者在早期阶段显示较高的FIPS值和较低的NRS评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号