首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>3 Biotech >Biases during DNA extraction affect bacterial and archaeal community profile of anaerobic digestion samples
【2h】

Biases during DNA extraction affect bacterial and archaeal community profile of anaerobic digestion samples

机译:DNA提取过程中的偏差影响厌氧消化样品的细菌和古细菌群落特征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste for biogas production has received much attention in recent years due to the increasing need for renewable energy and environmentally friendly waste management systems. Identification of the microbial community involved in AD aids in better understanding and optimising of the process. The choice of DNA extraction method is an integral step in any molecular biodiversity study. In the present study, potential biases introduced by DNA extraction methods were examined by comparing quality, quantity and representability of DNA extracted from AD samples using various extraction methods. In spite of the non-kit based method (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) yielding the largest quantity of DNA (approximately 44 µg DNA per gram dry weight), the extracted DNA contained PCR inhibitors. Furthermore, the quantity of extracted DNA was not proportional to species diversity. Diversity, determined using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), was strongly linked to the type of extraction method used. The spin-column filter-based kit that incorporated mechanical and chemical lysis (Macherey-Nagel kit) gave the best results in terms of bacterial and archaeal diversity (Shannon–Wiener indices: average 2.5 and 2.6, respectively). Furthermore, this kit was the most effective at lysing hard-to-lyse bacterial and archaeal cells. The choice of DNA extraction method significantly influences the reliability and comparability of results obtained during AD microbial ecology investigations. Moreover, the careful selection of the DNA extraction method is of particular importance when analysing AD samples since these samples are rich in PCR inhibitors and hard-to-lyse cells such as archaea and gram-positive bacteria.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13205-017-1009-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:近年来,由于对可再生能源和环境友好型废物管理系统的需求日益增加,用于沼气生产的有机废物的厌氧消化(AD)受到了广泛关注。识别AD中涉及的微生物群落有助于更好地了解和优化过程。 DNA提取方法的选择是任何分子生物多样性研究不可或缺的步骤。在本研究中,通过比较使用各种提取方法从AD样品中提取的DNA的质量,数量和可表示性,研究了DNA提取方法引入的潜在偏倚。尽管基于非试剂盒的方法(十六烷基三甲基溴化铵)产生最大量的DNA(每克干重约44 µg DNA),但提取的DNA仍含有PCR抑制剂。此外,提取的DNA数量与物种多样性不成比例。使用变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)确定的多样性与所用提取方法的类型密切相关。基于旋转柱过滤器的试剂盒结合了机械和化学裂解(Macherey-Nagel试剂盒),在细菌和古细菌的多样性方面达到了最佳效果(Shannon-Wiener指数分别为2.5和2.6)。此外,该试剂盒在裂解难裂解的细菌和古细菌细胞方面最有效。 DNA提取方法的选择会显着影响AD微生物生态学研究结果的可靠性和可比性。此外,在分析AD样品时,仔细选择DNA提取方法尤为重要,因为这些样品中富含PCR抑制剂和难以裂解的细胞,例如古细菌和革兰氏阳性细菌。 (doi:10.1007 / s13205-017-1009-x)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号