首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials
【2h】

Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials

机译:分光光度法评估聚醚醚酮(PEEK)作为核心材料并与金标准核心材料进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the colorimetric properties of different veneering materials on core materials. Standardized specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 1.5 mm) reflecting four core (polyetheretherketone (PEEK), zirconia (ZrO2), cobalt–chromium–molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo), and titanium oxide (TiO2); thickness: 1.5 mm) and veneering materials (VITA Mark II, IPS e.max CAD, LAVA Ultimate and VITA Enamic, all in shade A3; thickness: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 mm, respectively) were fabricated. Specimens were superimposed to assemblies, and the color was determined with a spectrophotometer (CieLab-System) or a chair-side color measurement device (VITA EasyShade), respectively. Data were analyzed using three-, two-, and one-way ANOVA, a Chi2-test, and a Wilson approach (p < 0.05). The measurements with EasyShade showed A2 for VITA Mark II, A3.5 for VITA Enamic, B2 for LAVA Ultimate, and B3 for IPS e.max CAD. LabE-values showed significant differences between the tested veneering materials (p < 0.001). CieLab-System and VITA EasyShade parameters of the different assemblies showed a significant impact of core (p < 0.001), veneering material (p < 0.001), and thickness of the veneering material (p < 0.001). PEEK as core material showed comparable outcomes as compared to ZrO2 and CoCrMo, with respect to CieLab-System parameters for each veneering material. The relative frequency of the measured VITA EasyShade parameters regarding PEEK cores also showed comparable results as compared to the gold standard CoCrMo, regardless of the veneering material used.
机译:这项研究调查了核心材料上不同饰面材料的比色特性。反射四个核心(聚醚醚酮(PEEK),氧化锆(ZrO2),钴铬钼合金(CoCrMo)和氧化钛(TiO2);厚度:1.5毫米)和饰面的标准样品(10毫米×10毫米×1.5毫米)制作了材料(VITA Mark II,IPS e.max CAD,LAVA Ultimate和VITA Enamic,均在阴影A3中;厚度分别为0.5、1.0、1.5和2 mm)。将样品叠加到组件上,并分别通过分光光度计(CieLab-System)或椅子侧颜色测量设备(VITA EasyShade)确定颜色。使用三向,二向和单向方差分析,Chi 2 检验和Wilson方法分析数据(p <0.05)。 EasyShade的测量结果显示,对于VITA Mark II,A2;对于VITA Enamic,A3.5;对于LAVA Ultimate,B2;对于IPS e.max CAD,B3。 LabE值显示了测试的饰面材料之间的显着差异(p <0.001)。不同组件的CieLab-System和VITA EasyShade参数显示了核心(p <0.001),饰面材料(p <0.001)和饰面材料的厚度(p <0.001)的显着影响。就每种饰面材料的CieLab系统参数而言,PEEK作为核心材料与ZrO2和CoCrMo相比显示出可比的结果。与黄金标准CoCrMo相比,与PEEK磁芯相比,所测量的VITA EasyShade参数的相对频率也显示了可比的结果,而与所使用的饰面材料无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号