首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Indian Journal of Surgery >Intra-abdominal Pressure Monitoring in Open Abdomen Management with Dynamic Abdominal Closure
【2h】

Intra-abdominal Pressure Monitoring in Open Abdomen Management with Dynamic Abdominal Closure

机译:动态腹部关闭术在开放腹部管理中的腹腔压力监测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The importance of elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have been recognized in critical care for its potential damaging effects. But, quantification of IAP values may be useful as a clinical tool for determining efficacy of coughing and straining for functional recovery of OA patients. We would like to evaluate IAP generated in an OA patient and the effect of negative pressure therapy (NPT) and dynamic abdominal closure systems (ABRA) on the IAP values at rest and during coughing and straining and compare those with IAP measurements of closed abdomen after standard open elective colorectal surgery (non-OA). Eight OA and eight non-OA patients were included in this study. OA patient with NPT and ABRA (OA + NA), OA patient without NPT and ABRA completely unbraced (OA-NA) (NA stands for NPT and ABRA), and non-OA patients underwent IAP measurements at rest, during coughing, and during straining via transurethral catheter. There was no difference in the mean of IAP measurement at rest in OA-NA (6.1 mmHg), OA + NA (6.5 mmHg), and non-OA (6.0 mmHg) patients. During coughing, IAP of OA-NA, OA + NA, and non-OA patients were 11.5, 19.1, and 22.0 mmHg and during straining, IAP of OA-NA, OA + NA, and non-OA patients were 11.5, 17.5, and 23.5 mmHg, respectively. Application of NPT in conjunction with ABRA did not increase IAP at rest but provided significant IAP increase in OA + NA patients, when compared to OA-NA patients during coughing and straining. NPT in conjunction with ABRA offers the advantage of increase of IAP during coughing and straining.
机译:腹腔内高压(IAP)和腹腔室综合征(ACS)的重要性已被公认为重症监护中潜在的破坏作用。但是,IAP值的量化可用作确定咳嗽和劳损对OA患者功能恢复的功效的临床工具。我们希望评估OA患者中产生的IAP以及负压疗法(NPT)和动态腹部闭合系统(ABRA)对休息时以及咳嗽和劳累时IAP值的影响,并将其与IAP测量后的腹部闭合性进行比较标准的开放性选择性结直肠手术(非OA)。这项研究包括八名OA和八名非OA患者。患有NPT和ABRA的OA患者(OA + NA),没有NPT和ABRA完全不支撑的OA患者(OA-NA)(NA代表NPT和ABRA),非OA患者在休息,咳嗽和咳嗽期间均接受IAP测量通过经尿道导管拉紧。 OA-NA(6.1mmHg),OA + NA(6.5mmHg)和非OA(6.0mmHg)患者的静息IAP测量平均值无差异。咳嗽期间,OA-NA,OA + NA和非OA患者的IAP为11.5、19.1和22.0 mmHg,拉紧期间,OA-NA,OA + NA和非OA患者的IAP为11.5、17.5,和23.5 mmHg。与咳嗽和劳损期间的OA-NA患者相比,将NPT与ABRA结合使用不会增加OA + NA患者的静息IAP,但会显着增加IAP。 NPT与ABRA结合提供的优势是在咳嗽和劳损时增加IAP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号