首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Injury Prevention >Controlled evaluation of a community based injury prevention program in Australia
【2h】

Controlled evaluation of a community based injury prevention program in Australia

机译:对照评估澳大利亚社区伤害预防计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a community based, all age, all injury prevention program, the Safe Living Program, on injury risk and injury rates. Design: A quasiexperimental population based evaluation using an intervention and comparison community design. Setting: The intervention community (Shire of Bulla, n=37 257) is an outer metropolitan area of Melbourne, Australia. The demographically matched comparison community (Shire of Melton, n=33 592) is located nearby. Subjects and methods: The Safe Living Program in the Shire of Bulla targeted injury reduction in all settings with a focus on high risk groups. Strategies included program publicity, education and training, injury hazard reduction, and environmental change. Baseline and follow up measures of program reach, risk factors, and injury rates in both communities were used to evaluate program process, impact, and outcome. Results: Increase in program awareness was moderate and similar to other community based programs. The program achieved injury hazard reduction on the road, in schools, and, to a more limited extent, in the home. Other changes in injury risk factors could not necessarily be attributed to the program as similar changes were observed in the comparison community. No significant changes were found in rates of injury deaths, hospitalisations, or emergency department presentations in the Shire of Bulla after six years. Self reported household injuries, mostly minor, were reduced in the intervention community, but had been higher at program launch than in the comparison community. Conclusions: The Safe Living Program was unable to replicate the significant reductions in injuries reported in other community based interventions. Replication of apparently successful community based injury prevention programs in different settings and populations requires evidence based interventions, sustained and effective program penetration, reliable data systems to measure change, at least one control community, and sufficient budget and time for effects to be observable.
机译:目的:评估基于社区的所有年龄段,所有伤害预防计划,安全生活计划对伤害风险和伤害率的影响。设计:采用干预和比较社区设计的准实验人群评估。地点:干预社区(Shira of Bulla,n = 37 257)是澳大利亚墨尔本的外围都会区。人口统计学匹配的比较社区(梅尔顿郡,n = 33 592)位于附近。主题和方法:Bulla郡的“安全生活计划”针对所有情况下的伤害减轻目标,重点是高风险人群。策略包括计划宣传,教育和培训,减少伤害危害以及环境变化。对两个社区的计划覆盖率,风险因素和伤害发生率进行了基线和后续措施,以评估计划过程,影响和结果。结果:程序意识的提高是中等的,与其他基于社区的程序相似。该计划在道路上,学校中以及在更有限的范围内在家中都减少了伤害危险。伤害风险因素的其他变化不一定归因于该程序,因为在比较社区中观察到了类似的变化。六年后,在Bulla郡,伤亡,住院或急诊科报告的发生率没有明显变化。在干预社区中,自我报告的家庭伤害(主要是轻微伤害)有所减少,但在计划启动时比在比较社区中更高。结论:“安全生活计划”无法复制其他基于社区的干预措施所报告的伤害显着减少。在不同环境和人群中复制显然成功的基于社区的伤害预防计划,需要采取循证干预措施,持续有效的计划渗透,可靠的数据系统来衡量变化,至少一个控制社区以及足够的预算和时间来观察效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号