首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Injury Prevention >Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial

机译:验证一项随机对照试验中使用的家庭安全调查表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To measure the validity of self reported safety practices from a questionnaire, completed by families participating in a home safety randomised controlled trial. >Methods: The postal questionnaire was used to measure secondary outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. The answers to 26 questions that could be assessed by observation were checked by a home visit. Families were invited to take part in a "home safety check"; they were not told that the visit was part of a validation study. At the time of the visit the researcher was blind to the self reports in the questionnaires. >Results: Sixty four questionnaires were validated by visits to 64 households. Percentage agreement ranged from 58% to 100%. Sensitivity was high (68% or above) for most safety practices. The positive predictive value was also high for most safety practices (78% or above for 15 of the 16 practices). >Conclusions: This study found a fairly high degree of consistency between self reported data and actual observations. The findings from this relatively small study need confirmation from larger studies.
机译:>目的:通过问卷调查来衡量自我报告的安全实践的有效性,该问卷由参加家庭安全随机对照试验的家庭填写。 >方法:在随机对照试验中,邮政问卷用于衡量次要结局。可以通过观察来评估对26个可以通过观察评估的问题的答案。邀请家人参加“家庭安全检查”;他们没有被告知访问是验证研究的一部分。在访问时,研究人员对问卷中的自我报告视而不见。 >结果:通过访问64户家庭,验证了64份问卷。协议百分比从58%到100%不等。对于大多数安全实践,灵敏度很高(68%或更高)。对于大多数安全实践,阳性预测值也很高(对于16种实践中的15种,则为78%或更高)。 >结论:该研究发现自我报告的数据与实际观察结果之间具有相当高的一致性。这项相对较小的研究的结果需要较大的研究证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号