Acticoat versus biobrane: a retrospective review on the treatment of paediatric mid-dermal torso burns

摘要

Objectives: Scalds involving toddlers commonly involve the torso and are frequently mid-dermal in depth. Initial management of a mid-dermal burn is conservative, progressing to grafting if healing has not been achieved in 10-14 days. Historically Biobrane^TM (UDL Laboratories, Inc., Sugar Land, TX) is thought to have more favourable clinical outcomes compared to Acticoat ^TM (Smith and Nephew, St. Petersburg, Fl, USA). The Burns Unit at The Children’s Hospital at Westmead (CHW) uses both dressings on a regular basis, providing the opportunity to compare the results of the dressings in a cohort of patients with mid-dermal torso burns. Method: A retrospective review was undertaken of all paediatric mid-dermal torso burns admitted to CHW between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcomes analysed were: time to complete healing and the need for grafting. Secondary outcomes included: operating theatre time, clinic visits, length of stay in hospital and positive wound swab colonisation. Results: 78 children met the study criteria, 64 (82%) in the Acticoat group and 14 (18%) in the Biobrane group. 36 out of 78 children (56%) in the Acticoat group had their burns spontaneously healed without the need of skin graft surgery, compared with 10 out of 14 children (71%) in the Biobrane group. The days to complete healing were quicker in the Acticoat group (13 days) compared to the Biobrane group (17 days), although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.3). Overall patients managed with the Biobrane dressing required more operative sessions under general anaesthesia, a longer hospital stay, more clinic visits and a higher number of positive wound swab colonisation with heavy growth compared to the Acticoat group. Conclusion: This study suggests that the use of the Biobrane dressing does not significantly improve the clinical outcomes of mid-dermal torso burns in children compared to the Acticoat dressing. Acticoat reduced healing time, decreased the requirements for a general anaesthesia, reduced inpatient hospital stay and risk of infection.