首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Burns and Trauma >Early tracheostomy in severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for decreased mechanical ventilation and increased hospital mortality
【2h】

Early tracheostomy in severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for decreased mechanical ventilation and increased hospital mortality

机译:重度脑外伤早期气管切开术:机械通气减少和医院死亡率增加的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: In the past, the authors performed a comprehensive literature review to identify all randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of early tracheostomy on severe brain injury outcomes. The search produced only two trials, one by Sugerman and another by Bouderka. Subjects and methods: The current authors initiated an Institutional Review Board-approved severe brain injury randomized trial to evaluate the impact of early tracheostomy on ventilator-associated pneumonia rates, intensive care unit (ICU)/ventilator days, and hospital mortality. Current study results were compared with the other randomized trials and a meta-analysis was performed. Results: Early tracheostomy pneumonia rates were Sugerman-48.6%, Bouderka-58.1%, and current study-46.7%. No early tracheostomy pneumonia rates were Sugerman-53.1%, Bouderka-61.3%, and current study-44.4%. Pneumonia rate meta-analysis showed no difference for early tracheostomy and no early tracheostomy (OR 0.89; p = 0.71). Early tracheostomy ICU/ventilator days were Sugerman-16 ± 5.9, Bouderka-14.5 ± 7.3, and current study-14.1 ± 5.7. No early tracheostomy ICU/ventilator days were Sugerman-19 ± 11.3, Bouderka-17.5 ± 10.6, and current study-17 ± 5.4. ICU/ventilator day meta-analysis showed 2.9 fewer days with early tracheostomy (p = 0.02). Early tracheostomy mortality rates were Sugerman-14.3%, Bouderka-38.7%, and current study-0%. No early tracheostomy mortality rates were Sugerman-3.2%, Bouderka-22.6%, and current study-0%. Randomized trial mortality rate meta-analysis showed a higher rate for early tracheostomy (OR 2.68; p = 0.05). Because the randomized trials were small, a literature assessment was undertaken to find all retrospective studies describing the association of early tracheostomy on severe brain injury hospital mortality. The review produced five retrospective studies, with a total of 3,356 patients. Retrospective study mortality rate meta-analysis demonstrated a larger mortality for early tracheostomy (OR 1.97; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: For severe brain injury, analyses indicate that ventilator-associated pneumonia rates are not decreased with early tracheostomy. Further, this study implies that mechanical ventilation is reduced with early tracheostomy. Both the randomized trial and retrospective meta-analysis indicate that risk for hospital death increases with early tracheostomy. Findings imply that early tracheostomy for severe brain injury is not a prudent routine policy.
机译:目的:过去,作者进行了全面的文献综述,以鉴定所有评估早期气管切开术对严重脑损伤结果的影响的随机对照试验。搜索只产生了两个试验,一个是Sugerman的试验,另一个是Bouderka的试验。受试者和方法:当前作者发起了一项机构审查委员会批准的严重脑损伤随机试验,以评估早期气管切开术对呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率,重症监护病房(ICU)/呼吸机天数和医院死亡率的影响。将当前研究结果与其他随机试验进行比较,并进行荟萃分析。结果:早期气管切开术肺炎发生率分别为Sugerman-48.6%,Bouderka-58.1%和当前研究-46.7%。早期气管切开术肺炎发生率分别为Sugerman-53.1%,Bouderka-61.3%和当前研究的44.4%。肺炎率荟萃分析显示早期气管切开术和早期气管切开术没有差异(OR 0.89; p = 0.71)。早期气管切开术ICU /呼吸机天数为Sugerman-16±5.9,Bouderka-14.5±7.3和当前研究的14.1±5.7。没有早期的气管切开术ICU /呼吸机天数为Sugerman-19±11.3,Bouderka-17.5±10.6和当前研究17±5.4。 ICU /呼吸机日荟萃分析显示,早期气管切开术减少了2.9天(p = 0.02)。早期气管切开术死亡率为Sugerman-14.3%,Bouderka-38.7%,当前研究为-0%。没有早期气管切开术死亡率为Sugerman-3.2%,Bouderka-22.6%,而当前研究为-0%。随机试验死亡率荟萃分析显示早期气管切开术的发生率更高(OR 2.68; p = 0.05)。由于随机试验规模较小,因此进行了文献评估,以发现所有回顾性研究,这些研究描述了早期气管切开术与严重脑损伤医院死亡率的关系。该评价产生了五项回顾性研究,共3356名患者。回顾性研究死亡率荟萃分析显示早期气管切开术的死亡率较高(OR 1.97; p <0.0001)。结论:对于严重的脑损伤,分析表明,早期气管切开术不能降低呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。此外,该研究表明早期气管切开术可减少机械通气。随机试验和回顾性荟萃分析均表明,早期气管切开术会增加医院死亡的风险。研究结果表明,对于严重的脑损伤,早期气管切开术不是一项审慎的常规政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号