首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology >Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation versus Bipolar Electrocautery for the Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: Comparison of Efficacy and Postoperative Morbidity
【2h】

Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation versus Bipolar Electrocautery for the Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: Comparison of Efficacy and Postoperative Morbidity

机译:射频热消融与双极电烙术治疗下鼻甲肥大:疗效和术后发病率的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction Numerous surgical methods are used to treat nasal obstruction due to inferior turbinate hypertrophy. The primary goal of the therapy is to maximize the nasal airway for as extended a period of time as possible while minimizing therapeutic complications. >Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the effects of radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA) and bipolar electrocautery (BEC) on the removal of nasal obstruction in patients with inferior turbinate hypertrophy and on nasal mucociliary clearance (MCC). Patients in both groups were also evaluated in terms of postoperative morbidity. >Methods We compared the outcomes of two groups of patients: those treated with RFTA (n = 23) and those who underwent BEC (n = 20). Nasal obstruction was graded using a visual analog scale (VAS) and MCC was measured using a saccharin clearance test. Both measurements were performed before and 2 months after treatment. >Results Pre- and postoperative VAS scores showed significant improvement for both groups. However, MCC results did not significantly differ between two groups. Neither edema nor crust formation persisted for more than 1 week in any patients. >Conclusion Submucosal cauterization with preservation of the nasal mucosa and periosteum is as effective and safe as RFTA and should be considered when planning inferior turbinate interventions.
机译:>简介许多手术方法用于治疗由于下鼻甲肥大而引起的鼻阻塞。该疗法的主要目的是在尽可能延长鼻腔气道时间的同时最大程度地减少治疗并发症。 >目的这项研究的目的是评估射频热消融(RFTA)和双极电烙术(BEC)对下鼻甲肥大患者鼻阻塞的清除以及鼻黏膜纤毛清除率(MCC)的影响)。还对两组患者的术后发病率进行了评估。 >方法我们比较了两组患者的结局:RFTA治疗组(n = 23)和接受BEC治疗的组(n = 20)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对鼻塞进行分级,并使用糖精清除试验测量MCC。两种测量均在治疗前和治疗后两个月进行。 >结果两组的术前和术后VAS评分均有明显改善。但是,两组之间的MCC结果没有显着差异。在任何患者中,水肿和结皮的形成都不会持续超过1周。 >结论保留鼻粘膜和骨膜的粘膜下烧灼与RFTA一样安全有效,在计划下鼻甲手术时应予以考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号