首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Awakening from anesthesia using propofol or sevoflurane with epidural block in radical surgery for senile gastric cancer
【2h】

Awakening from anesthesia using propofol or sevoflurane with epidural block in radical surgery for senile gastric cancer

机译:在老年胃癌的根治性手术中使用异丙酚或七氟醚与硬膜外阻滞麻醉后苏醒

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To study the awakening of the elderly patients from propofol intravenous general anesthesia or sevoflurane inhalation general anesthesia combined with epidural block after radical gastric cancer surgery. Method: Eighty cases receiving selective radical surgery for gastric cancer were included. They were aged 65-78 years and classified as ASA grade I-II. Using a random number table, the cases were divided into 4 groups (n = 20): propofol intravenous general anesthesia (P group), sevoflurane inhalation general anesthesia (S group), propofol intravenous general anesthesia combined with epidural block (PE group), and sevoflurane inhalation general anesthesia combined with epidural block (SE group). For P and PE group, target controlled infusion of propofol was performed; for S and SE group, sevoflurane was inhaled to induce and maintain general anesthesia; for PE and SE group, before general anesthesia induction, epidural puncture and catheterization at T7-8 was performed. After surgery, perform patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) or patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), and maintain VAS ≤ 3. The recorded indicators were as follows: time to recovery of spontaneous respiration, time to awakening, time of endotracheal tube removal, time to orientation, time to achieve modified Aldrete scores ≥ 9, modified OAA/S and Aldrete scores upon endotracheal tube removal (T1), 5 min after removal (T2), 15 min after removal (T3) and 30 min after removal (T4), dose of intraoperative remifentanil, intraoperative hypotension, and emergence agitation. Results: Time to awakening, time of endotracheal tube removal, time to orientation, and time to achieve modified Aldrete scores ≥ 9 in PE and SE group were obviously shortened compared with P and S group (P < 0.05); modified OAA/S and Aldrete scores at T1 and T2 in PE and SE group were significantly higher than those in P and S group (P < 0.05), and the scores of SE group at T1 were much higher compared to PE group (P < 0.05). Dose of intraoperative remifentanil in PE and SE group was significantly lower than that in P and S group. Conclusion: Compared to propofol intravenous general anesthesia or sevoflurane inhalation general anesthesia, propofol or sevoflurane general anesthesia combined with epidural block was more conducive to increasing the awakening quality of the senile patients from anesthesia after radical gastric cancer surgery. Moreover, sevofluorane inhalation general anesthesia combined with epidural block achieved a more stable hemodynamics and a shortened time to awakening.
机译:目的:探讨老年患者在根治性胃癌术后接受异丙酚静脉全麻或七氟醚吸入全麻联合硬膜外阻滞的苏醒。方法:包括80例接受胃癌根治性手术的患者。他们年龄在65-78岁之间,被归为ASA I-II级。使用随机数表将病例分为4组(n = 20):丙泊酚静脉全身麻醉(P组),七氟醚吸入全身麻醉(S组),丙泊酚静脉全身麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞(PE组),和七氟醚吸入全麻联合硬膜外阻滞(SE组)。对于P和PE组,进行靶控丙泊酚输注;对于S和SE组,吸入七氟醚以诱导并维持全身麻醉。对于PE和SE组,在全身麻醉诱导,T7-8硬膜外穿刺和导管插入之前进行。手术后,进行患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)或患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA),并维持VAS≤3。记录的指标如下:恢复自发呼吸的时间,醒来的时间,气管内插管切除的时间,定向时间,气管插管摘除(T1),摘除后5分钟(T2),摘除后15分钟(T3)和摘除后30分钟(T4)时达到修改后的Aldrete分数≥9,修改后的OAA / S和Aldrete分数的时间),术中瑞芬太尼的剂量,术中低血压和出现躁动。结果:与P组和S组相比,PE和SE组的觉醒时间,气管插管切除时间,定向时间和达到Aldrete改良分值≥9的时间均显着缩短(P <0.05); PE和SE组T1和T2的改良OAA / S和Aldrete评分明显高于P和S组(P <0.05),SE组在T1的评分远高于PE组(P < 0.05)。 PE和SE组术中瑞芬太尼的剂量明显低于P和S组。结论:与异丙酚静脉全身麻醉或七氟醚吸入全身麻醉相比,丙泊酚或七氟醚全身麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞更有利于提高老年胃癌根治术后手术后麻醉的清醒质量。此外,七氟烷吸入全麻与硬膜外阻滞相结合可实现更稳定的血液动力学和更短的觉醒时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号