首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Epidural injection with or without steroid in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain: ameta-analysis of ten randomized controlled trials
【2h】

Epidural injection with or without steroid in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain: ameta-analysis of ten randomized controlled trials

机译:硬膜外注射或不注射类固醇治疗慢性下背部和下肢疼痛:十项随机对照试验的ameta分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Chronic low back and lower extremity pain is mainly caused by lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and radiculitis. Various surgery and nonsurgical modalities, including epidural injections, have been used to treat LDH or radiculitis. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of the two interventions in managing various chronic low and lower extremity pain. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effect of local anesthetic with or without steroids. The outcomes included pain relief, functional improvement, opioid intake, and therapeutic procedural characteristics. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects or fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity between the included studies. Results: 10 RCTs (involving 1111 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that 41.7% of patients who received local anesthetic with steroid (group 1) and 40.2% of patients who received local anesthetic alone (group 2) had significant improvement in pain relief. And the Numeric Rating Scale pain scales were significantly reduced by 4.09 scores (95% CI: -4.26, -3.91), and 4.12 (95% CI: -4.35, -3.89) scores, respectively. Similarly, 39.8% of patients in group 1 and 40.7% of patients in group 2 achieved significantly improved functional status. The Oswestry Disability Index in the two groups were reduced by 14.5 (95% CI: -15.24, -13.75) and 12.37 (95% CI: -16.13, -8.62), respectively. The average procedures per year in group 1 was 3.68 ± 1.17 and 3.68 ± 1.26 in group 2 with an average total relief per year of 31.67 ± 13.17 weeks and 32.64 ± 13.92 weeks, respectively. The opioid intake decreased from baseline by 8.81 mg (95% CI: -12.24, -5.38) and 16.92 mg (95% CI: -22.71, -11.12) in the two groups, respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that epidural injections of local anesthetic with or without steroids have beneficial but similar effects in the treatment of patients with chronic low back and lower extremity pain.
机译:背景:慢性腰背和下肢疼痛主要是由腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)和神经根炎引起的。包括硬膜外注射在内的各种手术和非手术方式已用于治疗LDH或神经根炎。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估这两种干预措施在管理各种慢性下肢和下肢疼痛方面的效果。方法:进行系统的文献检索以鉴定随机对照试验(RCT),该试验比较了使用或不使用激素的局部麻醉药的效果。结果包括缓解疼痛,功能改善,阿片类药物摄入和治疗程序特征。使用随机效应或固定效应模型计算合并的估计,具体取决于所纳入研究之间的异质性。结果:这项荟萃分析包括10项RCT(涉及1111例患者)。汇总结果显示,接受类固醇局部麻醉的患者中有41.7%(组1)和仅接受局部麻醉的患者中有40.2%(组2)有明显的缓解疼痛的效果。数值评分量表的疼痛评分分别显着降低了4.09分(95%CI:-4.26,-3.91)和4.12分(95%CI:-4.35,-3.89)。同样,第1组的39.8%的患者和第2组的40.7%的患者的功能状态明显改善。两组的Oswestry残疾指数分别降低了14.5(95%CI:-15.24,-13.75)和12.37(95%CI:-16.13,-8.62)。第一组的年平均手术量为3.68±1.17和第2组的3.68±1.26,平均每年的总缓解时间分别为31.67±13.17周和32.64±13.92周。两组阿片类药物的摄入量分别较基线降低了8.81 mg(95%CI:-12.24,-5.38)和16.92 mg(95%CI:-22.71,-11.12)。结论:这项荟萃分析证实硬膜外注射局部麻醉药或不使用激素治疗慢性下腰痛和下肢疼痛的疗效相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号