首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal for Equity in Health >‘An uneasy compromise’: strategies and dilemmas in realizing a permissive abortion law in Ethiopia
【2h】

‘An uneasy compromise’: strategies and dilemmas in realizing a permissive abortion law in Ethiopia

机译:不安的妥协:埃塞俄比亚实现允许的堕胎法的策略和困境

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionAt the turn of the century, when the Millennium Development Goals placed maternal mortality reduction high on the global agenda, Ethiopia relaxed its restrictive abortion law to expand grounds on which a woman could legally obtain an abortion. This radical policy shift took place within a context of predominant anti-abortion public opinion shaped by strong religious convictions. Drawing upon Walt and Gilson’s policy analysis framework, this paper explores the tension between public policy and religious dogma for the strategies chosen by the Ethiopian Ministry of Health and its partners implementing the new policy, and for access to safe abortion services.
机译:引言在世纪之交,当千年发展目标将降低孕产妇死亡率放在全球议程的首位时,埃塞俄比亚放宽了限制性堕胎法,以扩大妇女合法获得堕胎的依据。这种根本性的政策转变是在强烈的宗教信仰塑造的反堕胎主流舆论的背景下发生的。本文基于沃尔特和吉尔森(Walt and Gilson)的政策分析框架,探讨了埃塞俄比亚卫生部及其合作伙伴实施新政策所选择的策略以及获得安全堕胎服务所面临的公共政策与宗教教条之间的张力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号