首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Nurturing Practitioner-Researcher Partnerships to Improve Adoption and Delivery of Research-Based Social and Public Health Services Worldwide
【2h】

Nurturing Practitioner-Researcher Partnerships to Improve Adoption and Delivery of Research-Based Social and Public Health Services Worldwide

机译:培育从业者与研究者之间的伙伴关系以改善全球基于研究的社会和公共卫生服务的采用和提供

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research-based practices—psychosocial, behavioral, and public health interventions—have been demonstrated to be effective and often cost-saving treatments, but they can take up to two decades to reach practitioners within the health and human services workforce worldwide. Practitioners often rely on anecdotal evidence and their “practice wisdom” rather than on research, and may thus unintentionally provide less effective or ineffective services. Worldwide, community engagement in research is recommended, particularly in low-resource contexts. However, practitioner involvement has not been adequately explored in its own right as an innovative community-engaged practice that requires a tailored approach. The involvement of practitioners in research has been shown to improve their use of research-based interventions, and thus the quality of care and client outcomes. Nevertheless, the literature is lacking specificity about when and how (that is, using which tasks and procedures) to nurture and develop practitioner–researcher partnerships. This paper offers theoretical and empirical evidence on practitioner–researcher partnerships as an innovation with potential to enhance each phase of the research cycle and improve services, using data from the United States, Brazil, and Spain. Recommendations for partnership development and sustainability are offered, and a case is made for involving practitioners in research in order to advance social justice by amplifying the local relevance of research, increasing the likelihood of dissemination to community settings, and securing the sustainability of research-based interventions in practice settings.
机译:已经证明以研究为基础的实践(社会心理,行为和公共卫生干预措施)是有效且通常可以节省成本的治疗方法,但要在全世界的卫生和公共服务从业人员中接触从业人员,可能需要长达二十年的时间。从业人员通常依靠轶事证据和他们的“实践智慧”,而不是研究,因此可能无意中提供了效果较差或无效的服务。在世界范围内,建议社区参与研究,尤其是在资源匮乏的情况下。但是,作为一种创新的社区参与型实践,需要采取量身定制的方法,因此,从业者的参与本身并未得到充分的探讨。实践证明,从业人员参与研究可以提高他们对基于研究的干预措施的使用,从而改善护理质量和服务对象的治疗效果。但是,文献缺乏关于何时以及如何(即使用哪些任务和程序)来培育和发展从业者与研究者之间的伙伴关系的专门性。本文使用来自美国,巴西和西班牙的数据,为从业者与研究者之间的伙伴关系作为一项创新提供了理论和经验证据,它有可能增强研究周期的每个阶段并改善服务。提供了有关伙伴关系发展和可持续性的建议,并提出了让从业人员参与研究的案例,以通过扩大研究在当地的相关性,增加向社区环境传播的可能性以及确保基于研究的可持续性来促进社会正义。干预实践设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号