首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators
【2h】

Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators

机译:评估可持续饮食的方法学和发展协调指标的潜力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The underlying values and priorities that drive policy responses depend largely on the constructs that researchers and decision makers select to measure and the metrics used. Despite much recent attention being given to sustainable diets and food systems and to the importance of clearly measuring sustainability to meet targets, to achieve goals, and to appraise dietary and environmental policies, it is not commonly agreed how the different indicators of sustainable diets are assessed. The evidence base for assessment of these indicators are frequently weak, fragmented, and arbitrary. The aim of this paper was to compare a range of published methods and indicators for assessing sustainable diets and food systems in order to harmonise them. Keyword and reference searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, CAB Abstracts, and Web of Knowledge. Fifty-two studies (21 proposed methods and 31 used methods) that combined environment, nutrition and health, and socioeconomic aspects of sustainable diets were reviewed. The majority (over 90%) of the studies focused on high-income countries. Twenty-eight studies assessed the environmental effects of different dietary practices, eight of the studies examined the nutrition and health indicators used for assessing sustainable food systems, and seven studies assessed the social and economic costs of diets. A classification of the elements was developed, and common elements are proposed for standardizing. These elements were categorized into nutrition and health indicators, environment indicators, and socioeconomic indicators. Standardized or harmonized indicators can be used for consistency and applicability purposes and to support, implement, and monitor relevant policies.
机译:驱动政策响应的基本价值和优先级在很大程度上取决于研究人员和决策者选择衡量的结构以及所使用的度量。尽管最近人们对可持续饮食和食物系统给予了极大关注,并明确了衡量可持续性以实现目标,实现目标以及评估饮食和环境政策的重要性,但人们普遍不同意如何评估可持续饮食的不同指标。评估这些指标的证据基础常常是薄弱,零散和武断的。本文的目的是比较一系列公开评估可持续饮食和食物系统的方法和指标,以使其协调一致。关键字和参考搜索在PubMed,Scopus,CAB Abstracts和Web of Knowledge中进行。回顾了52项研究(21项建议方法和31项使用过的方法),这些研究结合了环境,营养与健康以及可持续饮食的社会经济方面。大多数研究(超过90%)集中在高收入国家。二十八项研究评估了不同饮食习惯对环境的影响,八项研究评估了用于评估可持续粮食系统的营养和健康指标,七项研究评估了饮食的社会和经济成本。对元素进行了分类,并提出了通用元素以进行标准化。这些要素分为营养和健康指标,环境指标和社会经济指标。标准化或统一的指标可用于一致性和适用性目的,并支持,实施和监视相关政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号