首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >The JDCS Model and Blue-Collar Bullying: Decent Working Conditions for a Healthy Environment
【2h】

The JDCS Model and Blue-Collar Bullying: Decent Working Conditions for a Healthy Environment

机译:JDCS模型和蓝领欺凌:健康环境的体面工作条件

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Violence in the workplace and its health consequences still represent one of the main obstacles to obtaining decent working conditions. In particular, blue-collar workers run a greater risk of experiencing episodes of violence, also because of a lack of autonomy and fewer social interactions. According to the work environment hypothesis, factors such as high workload, lack of social support and lack of job control represent the antecedents of workplace bullying. Following the job demand-control-support model (JDCS), violence can be the symptom of a high-strain environment. Moreover, it is still unclear if workplace bullying can mediate the effects of work-related stress on workers’ health outcomes. The aim of the present study is to analyse the relationship between the components of the JDCS and the health of the workers considering workplace bullying as a mediating variable. By a cross sectional study design, we tested the following theoretical hypotheses: first, JDCS components (conceptualized as stress) are supposed to significantly predict the level of workers’ health. Second, workplace bullying is supposed to mediate the relationship between the JDCS components and the level of health. The sample consists of 400 blue-collars from three different Italian companies. Work-related stress, health outcomes and workplace bullying were measured by specific self-administered questionnaires and the relationships between the variables of interest were tested through a structural equation model (SEM) analysis. The results showed that while the direct relationship between the components of the JDCS and the level of psychological health is weaker (standardized path coefficients SPC = 0.21), the partial mediation hypothesis shows that workplace bullying mediate the relationship between JDCS components and health outcomes (χ2/df ratio = 2.70; path from stress to workplace bullying SPC = 0.78; path from workplace bullying to general health SPC = 0.51; p = 0.01). The JDCS components (workload, lack of control, lack of support) are useful predictors for workplace bullying. On the other hand, bullying plays a mediating role between the stress experienced and the health consequences. The present study adds new insights into the relationship between violence seen as a form of social behavioural strain and the psychological health of workers. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Future research on blue-collars could use longitudinal designs in order to analyse the relationship between social environment, job design and strain reactions.
机译:工作场所的暴力及其对健康的影响仍然是获得体面工作条件的主要障碍之一。特别是,由于缺乏自主权和较少的社会互动,蓝领工人遭受暴力事件的风险更大。根据工作环境假说,诸如高工作量,缺乏社会支持和缺乏工作控制等因素代表了工作场所欺凌行为的前身。遵循工作需求控制支持模型(JDCS),暴力可能是高压力环境的症状。此外,目前尚不清楚工作场所欺凌是否可以调解与工作有关的压力对工人健康状况的影响。本研究的目的是分析JDCS的组成部分与将工作场所欺凌作为中介变量的工人健康之间的关系。通过一项横断面研究设计,我们测试了以下理论假设:首先,JDCS组件(被概念化为压力)被认为可以显着预测工人的健康水平。其次,应该以工作场所欺凌来调解JDCS组件与健康水平之间的关系。样本包括来自三个不同意大利公司的400个蓝领。与工作相关的压力,健康结果和工作场所欺凌行为通过特定的自我管理问卷进行了测量,并且通过结构方程模型(SEM)分析测试了相关变量之间的关系。结果表明,尽管JDCS组件与心理健康水平之间的直接关系较弱(标准路径系数SPC = 0.21),但部分调解假设表明,工作场所欺凌会调解JDCS组件与健康结果之间的关系(χ 2 / df比率= 2.70;从压力到工作场所欺凌的SPC的路径= 0.78;从工作场所欺凌到总体健康的SPC的路径= 0.51; p = 0.01)。 JDCS组件(工作量,缺乏控制,缺乏支持)是工作场所欺凌的有用预测因素。另一方面,欺凌在经历的压力和健康后果之间起着中介作用。本研究为被视为一种社会行为压力的暴力与工人的心理健康之间的关系提供了新的见解。讨论了理论和实践意义。蓝领的未来研究可以使用纵向设计,以分析社会环境,工作设计和应变反应之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号