首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Are Parent-Held Child Health Records a Valuable Health Intervention? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Are Parent-Held Child Health Records a Valuable Health Intervention? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:父母主导的儿童健康记录是否是一项有价值的健康干预措施?系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Parent-held child health record (PHCHR), a public health intervention for promoting access to preventive health services, have been in use in many developed and developing countries. This review aimed to evaluate the use of the records toward promoting child health/development. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar to identify relevant articles, of which 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to considerable heterogeneity, findings were narratively synthesised. Outcomes with sufficient data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model. Odds Ratio (OR) was used to compute the pooled effect sizes at 95% confidence interval (CI). The pooled effect of the PHCHR on the utilisation of child/maternal healthcare was not statistically significant (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 0.92–1.88). However, parents who use the record in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) were approximately twice as likely to adhere to child vaccinations (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.01–3.70), utilise antenatal care (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.23–2.08), and better breastfeeding practice (OR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.02–7.82). Many parents (average-72%) perceived the PHCHR as useful/important and majority (average-84%) took it to child clinics. Health visitors and nurses/midwives were more likely to use the record than hospital doctors. It is concluded that parents generally valued the PHCHR, but its effect on child health-related outcomes have only been demonstrated in LMIC.
机译:父母持有的儿童健康档案(PHCHR)是一种公共卫生干预措施,旨在促进人们获得预防保健服务,在许多发达国家和发展中国家已经开始使用。这项审查旨在评估记录在促进儿童健康/发育方面的用途。我们搜索了PubMed,PsycINFO,CINAHL,Cochrane图书馆和Google Scholar,以找出相关文章,其中32项研究符合纳入标准。由于存在很大的异质性,因此对发现进行了叙述性的综合。使用随机效应模型对具有足够数据的结果进行荟萃分析。赔率(OR)用于计算95%置信区间(CI)下的合并效应大小。 PHCHR对利用儿童/孕产妇保健的综合影响没有统计学意义(OR = 1.31,95%CI 0.92-1.88)。但是,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中使用该记录的父母接受儿童疫苗接种的可能性大约为两倍(OR = 1.93,95%CI 1.01–3.70),并且使用了产前护理(OR = 1.60,95)。 %CI 1.23–2.08)和更好的母乳喂养方式(OR = 2.82,95%CI 1.02–7.82)。许多父母(平均72%)认为PHCHR是有用/重要的,大多数父母(平均84%)将其送往儿童诊所。卫生访问者和护士/助产士比医院医生更可能使用该记录。结论是,父母一般都重视PHCHR,但仅在LMIC中证明了其对儿童健康相关结局的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号