首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Roles of Different Transport Modes in the Spatial Spread of the 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Pandemic in Mainland China
【2h】

Roles of Different Transport Modes in the Spatial Spread of the 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Pandemic in Mainland China

机译:不同运输方式在中国2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行空间传播中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is increasing concern about another influenza pandemic in China. However, the understanding of the roles of transport modes in the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic spread across mainland China is limited. Herein, we collected 127,797 laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in mainland China from May 2009 to April 2010. Arrival days and peak days were calculated for all 340 prefectures to characterize the dissemination patterns of the pandemic. We first evaluated the effects of airports and railway stations on arrival days and peak days, and then we applied quantile regressions to quantify the relationships between arrival days and air, rail, and road travel. Our results showed that early arrival of the virus was not associated with an early incidence peak. Airports and railway stations in prefectures significantly advanced arrival days but had no significant impact on peak days. The pandemic spread across mainland China from the southeast to the northwest in two phases that were split at approximately 1 August 2009. Both air and road travel played a significant role in accelerating the spread during phases I and II, but rail travel was only significant during phase II. In conclusion, in addition to air and road travel, rail travel also played a significant role in accelerating influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 spread between prefectures. Establishing a multiscale mobility network that considers the competitive advantage of rail travel for mid to long distances is essential for understanding the influenza pandemic transmission in China.
机译:人们对中国的另一种流感大流行越来越关注。但是,对于在中国大陆地区传播的2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行中运输方式的作用的了解有限。在此,我们收集了2009年5月至2010年4月在中​​国大陆经实验室确认的127,797例甲型H1N1流感pdm09病例。计算了所有340个州的到港天数和高峰日,以表征大流行的传播方式。我们首先评估了机场和火车站对到达日和高峰日的影响,然后我们应用分位数回归来量化到达日与空中,铁路和公路旅行之间的关系。我们的结果表明,病毒的早期到达与早期发病高峰无关。州内的机场和火车站大大提前了到达日,但对高峰期没有明显影响。大流行从东南到西北分两个阶段蔓延到整个中国大陆,大约在2009年8月1日开始分裂。空中和公路旅行在加速第一和第二阶段的传播中起着重要作用,但铁路旅行仅在第二阶段。总之,除空中和公路旅行外,铁路旅行在加速甲型流感(H1N1)pdm09在县之间的传播中也发挥了重要作用。建立一个考虑到中长途铁路旅行的竞争优势的多尺度出行网络对于了解中国的流感大流行传播至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号