首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Social Integration Social Support and All-Cause Cardiovascular Disease and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study
【2h】

Social Integration Social Support and All-Cause Cardiovascular Disease and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study

机译:社会融合社会支持和全因心血管疾病和特定原因的死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social relationships are associated with all-cause mortality. Substantial uncertainties remain, however, for the associations of social relationships with mortality from subtypes of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and major non-vascular diseases. This prospective cohort study estimated mortality risks according to social support and social integration utilizing a nationally representative sample of 29,179 adults ages 18 years and older. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed. Social integration, but not social support was associated with all-cause mortality risk. For CVD mortality, social integration predicted a 33% lower risk (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.53–0.86). The results were similar in magnitude for heart disease mortality. Participants with the highest social integration level had a 53%, 30%, and 47% decreased mortality risk of diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, and chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRD) than those with the lowest level. These social integration associations were linear and consistent across baseline age, sex and socioeconomic status. We did not observe an association of social integration with the risk of cancer mortality. Our findings support the linear association of social integration but not social support with mortality from a range of major chronic diseases in the US adult population, independent of socioeconomic status (SES), behavioral risk factors, and health status.
机译:社会关系与全因死亡率有关。然而,社会关系与心血管疾病(CVD)亚型和主要非血管疾病的死亡率之间的关联仍存在很大的不确定性。这项前瞻性队列研究使用了29,179名18岁以上成年人的全国代表性样本,根据社会支持和社会融合估算了死亡风险。使用Cox比例风险回归模型。社会融合而不是社会支持与全因死亡率风险有关。对于CVD死亡率,社会融合预测患病风险降低33%(HR = 0.67,95%CI = 0.53-0.86)。心脏病死亡率的结果相似。社交融合程度最高的参与者与糖尿病,社会融合程度最低的参与者相比,罹患糖尿病,阿尔茨海默氏病和慢性下呼吸道疾病(CLRD)的死亡率降低了53%,30%和47%。这些社会融合协会是线性的,并且在基线年龄,性别和社会经济地位上保持一致。我们没有观察到社会融合与癌症死亡风险之间的关联。我们的发现支持社会融合的线性关联,但不支持社会支持与美国成年人口一系列主要慢性病死亡率的线性关联,而与社会经济地位(SES),行为危险因素和健康状况无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号