首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

机译:常规艾灸和无烟艾灸对膝骨关节炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundConventional moxibustion is a representative non-drug intervention in traditional Chinese medicine, and it has been reported to produce encouraging results and benefits in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in previous clinical trials and systematic reviews. Given that increasing concerns on the safety of generated smoke from conventional moxibustion have received much attention, smoke-free moxibustion is regarded as a potential alternative. However, whether smoke-free moxibustion would display a similar efficacy to that of conventional moxibustion still remains unclear. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial attempts to investigate the difference of efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion in patients with KOA.
机译:背景技术传统的艾灸疗法是传统中药的一种非药物干预手段,据报道,在以往的临床试验和系统评价中,传统的艾灸疗法在缓解膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)的症状和改善生活质量方面产生了令人鼓舞的结果和益处。鉴于人们越来越关注常规艾灸产生的烟雾的安全性,因此无烟艾灸被视为一种潜在的替代方法。然而,无烟艾灸是否会显示出与传统艾灸相似的功效仍不清楚。因此,这项随机对照试验试图研究传统艾灸和无烟艾灸对KOA患者的疗效差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号