首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Thromboelastometry versus standard coagulation tests versus restrictive protocol to guide blood transfusion prior to central venous catheterization in cirrhosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Thromboelastometry versus standard coagulation tests versus restrictive protocol to guide blood transfusion prior to central venous catheterization in cirrhosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:血栓弹力测定法标准凝血试验与限制性方案以指导肝硬化中心静脉导管插入前的输血:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundLiver failure patients have traditionally been empirically transfused prior to invasive procedures. Blood transfusion is associated with immunologic and nonimmunologic reactions, increased risk of adverse outcomes and high costs. Scientific evidence supporting empirical transfusion is lacking, and the best approach for blood transfusion prior to invasive procedures in cirrhotic patients has not been established so far.The aim of this study is to compare three transfusion strategies (routine coagulation test-guided – ordinary or restrictive, or thromboelastometry-guided) prior to central venous catheterization in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.
机译:背景技术肝衰竭患者传统上在侵入性手术之前根据经验进行输血。输血与免疫和非免疫反应,不良后果的风险增加和高成本有关。尚缺乏支持经验性输血的科学证据,到目前为止,尚没有建立肝硬化患者在侵入性手术之前进行输血的最佳方法。本研究的目的是比较三种输血策略(常规凝血测试指导–常规或限制性)重症肝硬化患者,请先进行中心静脉导管插入术或血栓弹力描记术引导)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号