首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Surefire infusion system versus standard microcatheter use during holmium-166 radioembolization: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Surefire infusion system versus standard microcatheter use during holmium-166 radioembolization: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:ure166放射栓塞期间Surefire输液系统与标准微导管的使用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAn anti-reflux catheter (ARC) may increase the tumor absorbed dose during radioembolization (RE) by elimination of particle reflux and its effects on hemodynamics. Since the catheter is fixed in a centro-luminal position, it may also increase the predictive accuracy of a scout dose administration before treatment. The purpose of the SIM trial is to compare the effects of ARC use during RE with holmium-166 (166Ho) microspheres in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), with the use of a standard end-hole microcatheter.
机译:背景技术抗反流导管(ARC)可以通过消除颗粒反流及其对血液动力学的影响来增加放射性栓塞(RE)期间肿瘤的吸收剂量。由于导管固定在中心腔位置,因此还可以提高治疗前侦查剂量给药的预测准确性。 SIM试验的目的是比较RE期间使用ARC和with 166( 166 Ho)微球对结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者的影响,并采用标准的末端孔微导管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号