首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Molecular Pathology >Evaluation of swab transport systems against a published standard
【2h】

Evaluation of swab transport systems against a published standard

机译:根据已发布的标准评估拭子运输系统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Before the publication of the M40-A standard by the United States National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), no quality control data for swab transport systems (STSs) had been available.>Aims: To compare three commercially available STSs against the published standard to ascertain bacterial survival after a set holding time.>Method: Charcoal and non-charcoal containing swabs were inoculated with standard volumes and numbers of a range of bacteria commonly isolated from clinical material. Bacterial counts were taken at time zero, six, 24, and 48 hours, with the results being compared against the NCCLS standard.>Results: The standard clearly differentiated between the three STSs tested, with one product being superior to the other two products in providing better survival.>Conclusion: The standard now provides manufacturers and users of STSs with meaningful data to provide, purchase, and compare an STS for routine clinical use.
机译:>背景:在美国临床实验室标准全国委员会(NCCLS)发布M40-A标准之前,尚无拭子运输系统(STS)的质量控制数据。>目的:将三种市售STS与已发布的标准进行比较,以确定在设定的保存时间后细菌的存活率。>方法:用标准体积和数量的木炭接种含木炭和不含木炭的棉签通常从临床材料中分离出的一系列细菌。在零,六,二十四和四十八小时对细菌进行计数,并将结果与​​NCCLS标准进行比较。>结果:该标准明确区分了所测试的三种STS,其中一种产品具有优势>结论:该标准现在为STS的制造商和用户提供有意义的数据,以提供,购买和比较用于常规临床用途的STS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号