首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology >Inclusion Fluorescent-Antibody Test as a Screening Assay for Detection of Antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae
【2h】

Inclusion Fluorescent-Antibody Test as a Screening Assay for Detection of Antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae

机译:包含荧光抗体试验作为检测肺炎衣原体抗体的筛选方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A study was conducted to determine the ability of the inclusion immunofluorescence assay (inclusion IFA) to act as a screening test to detect samples with antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae; microimmunofluorescence (MIF) was used as the “gold standard.” In addition, the inclusion IFA was compared using HEp-2 cells infected with either C. pneumoniae CM-1 or Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E. A total of 331 serum samples representing a range of MIF titers were evaluated. The sensitivities of the inclusion IFA for detecting samples with C. pneumoniae MIF titers of ≥16 were 96.9 and 74.8% with C. pneumoniae- and C. trachomatis-infected cells, respectively. For samples with an elevated C. pneumoniae MIF titer of ≥512, the sensitivities of the C. pneumoniae- and C. trachomatis-based inclusion IFA were 97.0 and 8.8%, respectively. These results suggest that the inclusion IFA is not a genus-specific test, as evidenced by the failure of the C. trachomatis-infected cells to detect a significant number of samples with C. pneumoniae antibodies. Samples that had elevated C. pneumoniae inclusion IFA and MIF titers but that were found negative (titer, <16) by the C. trachomatis inclusion IFA were further tested by an in vitro neutralization assay for functional antibodies that might not have been detected by the serological assays. The in vitro neutralization results corroborated the serological results in that all seven sera tested had a neutralization titer for C. pneumoniae (range, 20 to 225), while all but one failed to have any effect on the infectivity of C. trachomatis serovar E. While the C. pneumoniae inclusion IFA had a high sensitivity for detecting chlamydial antibodies, depending on whether it was used as a screening test for detecting samples with low (≥16) or elevated (≥512) MIF titers, its specificity ranged from 53.4 to 77.1%. In conclusion, the inclusion IFA with C. pneumoniae-infected cells was best suited as a sensitive screening test for identifying specimens with elevated MIF titers (those associated with a possible acute infection with C. pneumoniae).
机译:进行了一项研究,以确定包涵体免疫荧光测定(包涵体IFA)作为筛选测试的能力,以检测带有肺炎衣原体抗体的样品;微免疫荧光(MIF)被用作“金标准”。此外,使用感染了肺炎衣原体CM-1或沙眼衣原体血清型E的HEp-2细胞比较了包含IFA。共评估了331份代表一系列MIF滴度的血清样品。对于感染了肺炎衣原体和沙眼衣原体的细胞,夹杂物IFA检出肺炎衣原体MIF滴度≥16的样品的灵敏度分别为96.9和74.8%。对于肺炎衣原体MIF滴度≥512的样品,基于肺炎衣原体和沙眼衣原体的夹杂物IFA的敏感性分别为97.0和8.8%。这些结果表明,包含IFA并非属特异性测试,沙眼衣原体感染细胞未能检测出大量肺炎衣原体抗体样本,这证明了这一点。肺炎衣原体包含IFA和MIF滴度升高但沙眼衣原体包含IFA呈阴性(滴度,<16)的样品通过体外中和测定进一步测试了功能性抗体,而该功能性抗体可能没有被检测到。血清学检测。体外中和结果证实了血清学结果,因为所测试的所有七个血清均具有肺炎衣原体的中和滴度(范围为20至225),而除一个以外的所有血清均未对沙眼衣原体血清型E的感染性产生任何影响。虽然肺炎衣原体包涵物IFA对检测衣原体抗体具有很高的灵敏度,但取决于是否将其用作检测MIF滴度低(≥16)或升高(≥512)的样品的筛选测试,其特异性范围为53.4至77.1%。总之,将IFA与 C包含在一起。肺炎球菌感染的细胞最适合用作敏感筛查试验,以鉴定MIF滴度升高的标本(那些可能与肺炎衣原体的急性感染有关)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号