首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Medical Association Journal >Interpretation of diagnostic data: 3. How to do it with a simple table (part B).
【2h】

Interpretation of diagnostic data: 3. How to do it with a simple table (part B).

机译:诊断数据的解释:3.如何用一个简单的表(B部分)进行操作。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The following guidelines are useful if you want to "do it with a simple table" (Table IV): First, identify the sensitivity and specificity of the sign, symptom or diagnostic test you plan to use. Many are already in the literature, and subspecialists should either know them for their field or be able to track them down for you. Depending on whether you are considering a sign, a symptom or a diagnostic laboratory test, you will want to track down a clinical subspecialist, a radiologist, a pathologist and so on. Start your table with a total of 1000 patients, as shown in location (a + b + c + d) of panel A. Using the information you have about the patient before you apply the diagnostic test, estimate the patient's pretest likelihood (prevalence or prior probability) of the target disorder -- let's say 10%. Take this proportion of the total (100) and place it in location (a + c); the remaining 900 patients go in location (b + d) (panel B). Multiply (a + c) (100) by the sensitivity of the diagnostic test (let's say 83%) and place the result (83) in cell a and the difference (17) in cell c; similarly, multiply (b + d) (900) by the specificity of the diagnostic test (let's say 91%) and place the result (819) in cell d and the difference (81) in cell b (panel C). If (a + b) and (c + d) do not add up to 1000, you will know you have made a mistake. You can now calculate the positive predictive value, a/(a + b), and the negative predictive value, d/(c + d), as shown in panel D. You have now reached a level of understanding a fair bit beyond the rule-in/rule-out strategy discussed in part 1 of our series. Furthermore, you can already do more than most clinicians, so you may want to stop here, at least for a while. On the other hand, you may want to go further and learn how to handle slightly more complex tables with multiple cut-off points. In the next article you will find more powerful ways to take advantage of the degree of positivity and negativity of diagnostic test results.
机译:如果要“用一个简单的表格进行操作”(表IV),以下准则很有用:首先,确定要使用的体征,症状或诊断测试的敏感性和特异性。许多文献已经在文献中,专科医生应该要么在他们的领域中了解它们,要么能够为您找到它们。根据要考虑的是征兆,症状还是诊断实验室检查,您将需要跟踪临床亚专科医生,放射科医生,病理学家等。如表A的位置(a + b + c + d)所示,一共有1000位患者开始您的表格。在进行诊断测试之前,使用您拥有的有关患者的信息,估计患者的测试前可能性(患病率或目标疾病的先验概率),例如10%。取这个总数(100)的比例并将其放在位置(a + c);其余900位患者位于(b + d)位置(面板B)。将(a + c)(100)乘以诊断测试的灵敏度(假设为83%),并将结果(83)放入单元格a,将差值(17)放入单元格c;类似地,将(b + d)(900)乘以诊断测试的特异性(假设为91%),并将结果(819)放入单元格d,将差值(81)放入单元格b(面板C)。如果(a + b)和(c + d)的总和不等于1000,您将知道自己犯了一个错误。现在,您可以计算正预测值a /(a + b)和负预测值d /(c + d),如面板D中所示。在本系列的第1部分中讨论了规则制定/淘汰策略。此外,您已经可以完成比大多数临床医生更多的工作,因此您可能要在这里停留至少一段时间。另一方面,您可能想更进一步,学习如何处理具有多个截止点的稍微复杂的表。在下一篇文章中,您将找到更有效的方法来利用诊断测试结果的阳性和阴性程度。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 1983(129),7
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 705–710
  • 总页数 6
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号